Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A New and Rapid Scoring System to Assess the Scientific Evidence from Clinical Trials

8 references·1 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
2005External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”2,541 cited
2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
2006Clinical decision-making based on findings presented in conference abstracts: is it safe for our patients?29 cited

Cited by

2007The Emperor’s New Clothes9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work