SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Clinical decision-making based on findings presented in conference abstracts: is it safe for our patients?
7 references·8 citing·47 second hop
Clinical decision-making based on findings presented in conference abstracts: is it safe for our patients? (2006)Clinical decision-making based on finding…Transition From Meeting Abstract to Full-length Journal Article for Randomized Controlled Trials (2006)Transition From Meeting Abstr…From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals (2005)From conference abstract to f…AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF ORTHOPAEDIC ABSTRACTS AND SUBSEQUENT FULL-TEXT PUBLICATIONS (2002)AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF ORT…Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Presented at the Society for Pediatric Research Meeting (2002)Abstracts of Randomized Contr…Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects (1997)Publication bias: evidence of…Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Manuscript Quality before and…Are published manuscripts representative of the surgical meeting abstracts? An objective appraisal (1987)Are published manuscripts rep…Türk Ulusal Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Kongre bildirilerinin analizi ve yayımlanma oranları (2014)Türk Ulusal Kulak Burun Boğaz…ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study (2013)ClinicalTrials.gov registrati…Factors associated with publication of plenary presentations at the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists annual meeting (2012)Factors associated with publi…Publicação de trabalhos científicos apresentados em Congresso de Trauma no Brasil (2011)Publicação de trabalhos cient…Analysis of trends in the full publication of papers from conference abstracts involving pre-harvest or abattoir-level interventions against foodborne pathogens (2010)Analysis of trends in the ful…Do recorded abstracts from scientific meetings concur with the research presented? (2009)Do recorded abstracts from sc…Peer review in open access scientific journals. (2007)Peer review in open access sc…A New and Rapid Scoring System to Assess the Scientific Evidence from Clinical Trials (2006)A New and Rapid Scoring Syste…Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quality of Abstracts Describing Randomized Trials in the Proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology Meetings: Guidelines for Improved Reporting (2004)Negative pressure wound therapy: Potential publication bias caused by lack of access to unpublished study results data (2008)A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research (2017)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Review: Benzodiazepines in generalized anxiety disorder: heterogeneity of outcomes based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials (2007)Press Releases by Academic Medical Centers: Not So Academic? (2009)Are Medical Conferences Useful? And for Whom? (2012)Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in Articles for Medical Journals (1988)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles (1999)The fate of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993: rate of subsequent publication in peer-reviewed, indexed journals. (1999)Current findings from research on structured abstracts: an update (2014)Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC) (2020)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Integrating multiple data sources (MUDS) for meta-analysis to improve patient-centered outcomes research: a protocol for a systematic review (2015)Reporting Weaknesses in Conference Abstracts of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Ophthalmology (2015)Evaluation of Systematic Reviews of Interventions for Retina and Vitreous Conditions (2019)Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Screen time and sleep among school-aged children and adolescents: A systematic literature review (2014)Full Publication of Results Initially Presented in Abstracts (1994)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)The art and science of knowledge synthesis (2010)Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review (2015)From pre-registration to publication: a non-technical primer for conducting a meta-analysis to synthesize correlational data (2015)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Comparison of outcomes and other variables between conference abstracts and subsequent peer-reviewed papers involving pre-harvest or abattoir-level interventions against foodborne pathogens (2010)An introduction to systematic reviews in animal health, animal welfare, and food safety (2014)Publication rate of studies presented at veterinary anaesthesia specialty meetings during the years 2003–2008 (2015)Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Therapeutic Devices and Procedures (2005)Publication Bias in Abstracts Presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects820 cited
  • 1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
  • 2002AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF ORTHOPAEDIC ABSTRACTS AND SUBSEQUENT FULL-TEXT PUBLICATIONS263 cited
  • 2006Transition From Meeting Abstract to Full-length Journal Article for Randomized Controlled Trials159 cited
  • 2002Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Presented at the Society for Pediatric Research Meeting89 cited
  • 2005From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals83 cited
  • 1987Are published manuscripts representative of the surgical meeting abstracts? An objective appraisal60 cited

Cited by

  • 2013ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study31 cited
  • 2006A New and Rapid Scoring System to Assess the Scientific Evidence from Clinical Trials22 cited
  • 2010Analysis of trends in the full publication of papers from conference abstracts involving pre-harvest or abattoir-level interventions against foodborne pathogens21 cited
  • 2014Türk Ulusal Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Kongre bildirilerinin analizi ve yayımlanma oranları16 cited
  • 2007Peer review in open access scientific journals.12 cited
  • 2011Publicação de trabalhos científicos apresentados em Congresso de Trauma no Brasil

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

12 cited
  • 2009Do recorded abstracts from scientific meetings concur with the research presented?11 cited
  • 2012Factors associated with publication of plenary presentations at the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists annual meeting9 cited