Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting

Richard D Riley, Paul C. Lambert, Ghada Abo-Zaid

2010-02-05reviewBMJ1,701 citationsbronze

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

The use of individual participant data instead of aggregate data in meta-analyses has many potential advantages, both statistically and clinically. Richard D Riley and colleagues describe the rationale for an individual participant data meta-analysis and outline how to conduct this type of study

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,701 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting

2008A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis

Cited by

2015Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data

2019Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis

2020Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math

2013Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach.

2009A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research

2021Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression

2016Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse

2019A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies