Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Patent Assertions: Are We Any Closer to Aligning Reward to Contribution?

10 references·2 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2016Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking320 cited
2016Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking311 cited
2008How Strong Are Weak Patents?254 cited
2007STANDARD SETTING, PATENTS, AND HOLD-UP226 cited
2010Injunctions, Hold-Up, and Patent Royalties149 cited
2013A Simple Approach to Setting Reasonable Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents94 cited
2013Strategic Patent Acquisitions89 cited
2011An Empirical Study of Patent Litigation Timing: Could a Patent Term Reduction Decimate Trolls Without Harming Innovators?76 cited
2015Do Patent Licensing Demands Mean Innovation?73 cited
2007Patent Reform: Aligning Reward and Contribution63 cited

Cited by

2020Do Standard-Essential Patent Owners Behave Opportunistically? Evidence From U.S. District Court Dockets31 cited
2017Patent Assertion Entities and Legal Exceptionalism in Europe and the United States, a Comparative View18 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work