Choice of health-care facility after introduction of free essential health services in Nepal

Rajendra Karkee · Jhalka Kadariya

24 citations0/0 files storedWHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Healthcare Systems and Reforms Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction Public Health and Social Inequalities

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Choice of health-care services depends on patients' characteristics and the features of health-care facilities available. In Nepal, a significant proportion of health care is provided through the private sector, despite the introduction of free essential health care for all citizens in 2008. We sought to determine whether people chose private or public facilities in the first instance for acute health problems. We also assessed the reasons for their choice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was done by use of a questionnaire administered to 400 household heads in Jhapa district, Nepal. RESULTS: 272 (68%) respondents sought treatment from public health-care facilities in the first instance. On adjusted analysis, illiterate people were more likely to choose public facilities than people with higher secondary education (OR 5.47, P = 0.002). Similarly, lower-caste and religious-minority respondents were more likely to choose public facilities than disadvantaged janajati (OR 2.33, P = 0.01). Among respondents who used public facilities, 174 (64.0%) and 109 (40.0%) stated that that their choice was based on financial accessibility and physical accessibility, respectively. Among respondents who used private facilities, 65 (50.7%) and 54 (42.1%) said their choice was based on adequacy of resources/services and health-care delivery, respectively. CONCLUSION: A substantial portion of respondents used public health-care facilities in the first instance, mainly because of financial and physical accessibility rather than adequacy of resources or better health-care delivery. These results may indicate a positive impact of removal of user fees for public health-care facilities in Nepal, especially for impoverished people.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.

References

2017The United Nations Development Programme 2008The impact of user fees on health service utilization in low- and middle-income countries: how strong is the evidence?1995Quality, cost and utilization of health services in developing countries. A longitudinal study in Zaïre 2011Abolition of user fees: the Uganda paradox 1998Determinants of patient choice of medical provider: a case study in rural China 1998Measuring lay people's perceptions of the quality of primary health care services in developing countries. Validation of a 20-item scale 2005Patterns of health service utilization and perceptions of needs and services in rural Orissa 2002Primary health concept revisited: Where do people seek health care in a rural area of Vietnam?

Cited by

2019Determinants of Health-seeking Behaviour in Northeast India

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.