Exploring the Gender Gap in Support for a Woman for President

Stefanie Simon · Crystal L. Hoyt

36 citations0/0 files storedAnalyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Gender Politics and Representation Gender and Feminist Studies Social and Intergroup Psychology

Abstract

The gender gap in support for a female presidential candidate gathered much media attention with Hillary Clinton as a frontrunner for the 2008 democratic presidential nomination. Two common explanations for this gap are that women have more liberal gender role and political attitudes. We contend that another important, and distinct, factor for heightened support among women is a shared social identity. We tested these three explanations across two studies. In Study 1, hierarchical regression analyses revealed that both attitudes toward women and sex independently predict a significant proportion of the variance in willingness to elect a woman for president. In Study 2, hierarchical regression analyses showed that when entered together, attitudes toward female authority and sex independently predict support, but when political attitudes was entered, only sex and political attitudes predicted support for Clinton. Finally, as expected, when primed with their gender identity, women increased their support for Clinton and men decreased their support, and women perceived her more favorably and men less so. In sum, these studies strongly support the arguments that the gender gap in support for female presidential candidates stems in part from women's more liberal gender role and political attitudes, and also from women sharing the same gender social identity as a female candidate for commander in chief.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 36 citations exist upstream.

References

1979The Social psychology of intergroup relations 1982Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations 2002Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.2003Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.2001Description and Prescription: How Gender Stereotypes Prevent Women's Ascent Up the Organizational Ladder 2008Through the labyrinth: the truth about how women become leaders 2001Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women 1992Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis.

Cited by

2013Gender Bias in Leader Evaluations 2012Becoming a candidate: political ambition and the decision to run for office 2016Refusing to know a woman’s place: the causes and consequences of rejecting stereotypes of women politicians in the Americas 2016Gender Attitudes, Gendered Partisanship: Feminism and Support for Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton among Party Activists 2021Keeping women in their place? The prevalence of gender role attitudes among local party chairs in Flanders

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.