Is Justice Really Blind? Race and Reversal in US Courts

Maya Sen

51 citations0/0 files storedThe Journal of Legal Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Judicial and Constitutional Studies Legal processes and jurisprudence Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems

Abstract

I use two newly collected data sets to demonstrate that black federal district judges are consistently overturned on appeal more often than white district judges, with a gap in reversal rates of up to 10 percentage points. This gap is robust and persists after taking into account previous professional and judicial experience, educational background, qualification ratings assigned by the American Bar Association, and differences in appellate panel composition. In total, I find that approximately 2,800 additional cases authored by black judges have been reversed over the last 12 years. This study is among the first to explore how higher-court judges evaluate opinions written by judges of color, and it has clear implications: despite attempts to make the judiciary more reflective of the general population, racial disparities in the legal system appear to persist.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 51 citations exist upstream.

References

2004Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination 1969The Concept of Representation, by Hanna F. Pitkin 2007Implicit Bias among Physicians and its Prediction of Thrombolysis Decisions for Black and White Patients 2011Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards 2004Understanding the Black-White Test Score Gap in the First Two Years of School 1986Men and Women at Work: Sex Segregation and Statistical Discrimination 2006Implicit Bias: Scientific Foundations 2000Social Capital at Work: Networks and Employment at a Phone Center

Cited by

2019The hashtag heard round the world: how #MeToo did what laws did not 2018Of Whites and men: How gender and race impact authorship of published and unpublished opinions in the US courts of appeals 2021The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Behavior 2022Ethnic Bias in Judicial Decision Making: Evidence from Criminal Appeals in Kenya 2021Ascriptive Characteristics and Perceptions of Impropriety in the Rule of Law: Race, Gender, and Public Assessments of Whether Judges Can Be Impartial

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.