SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
ON THE RELATION BETWEEN REINFORCER EFFICACY AND PREFERENCE
7 references·2 citing·31 second hop
ON THE RELATION BETWEEN REINFORCER EFFICACY AND PREFERENCE (2010)ON THE RELATION BETWEEN REINFORCER EFFICA…ON THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES AND PROGRESSIVE‐RATIO SCHEDULE ASSESSMENTS OF STIMULUS VALUE (2009)ON THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN…PREFERENCE FOR REINFORCERS UNDER PROGRESSIVE‐ AND FIXED‐RATIO SCHEDULES: A COMPARISON OF SINGLE AND CONCURRENT ARRANGEMENTS (2008)PREFERENCE FOR REINFORCERS UN…RELATIVE VERSUS ABSOLUTE REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS (1999)RELATIVE VERSUS ABSOLUTE REIN…ON THE DISPLACEMENT OF LEISURE ITEMS BY FOOD DURING MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS (1999)ON THE DISPLACEMENT OF LEISUR…DISPLACEMENT OF LEISURE REINFORCERS BY FOOD DURING PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS (1997)DISPLACEMENT OF LEISURE REINF…A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES (1992)A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHE…REINFORCER SAMPLING: A TECHNIQUE FOR INCREASING THE BEHAVIOR OF MENTAL PATIENTS1 (1968)REINFORCER SAMPLING: A TECHNI…CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN SINGLE VERSUS DAILY PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES AND REINFORCER EFFICACY UNDER PROGRESSIVE‐RATIO SCHEDULES (2012)CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN SINGLE…ASSESSING PREFERENCE FOR SOCIAL INTERACTION IN CHILDREN DIAGNOSED WITH AUTISM (2012)ASSESSING PREFERENCE FOR SOCI…USING A CHOICE ASSESSMENT TO PREDICT REINFORCER EFFECTIVENESS (1996)Assessing preference for social interactions (2012)Clinical Decision Making and Preference Assessment for Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (2014)ESTABLISHING OPERATIONS AND REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS (1991)EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCES (1996)Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. (1996)PREDICTING THE RELATIVE EFFICACY OF THREE PRESENTATION METHODS FOR ASSESSING PREFERENCES OF PERSONS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES (2002)The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis (1939)THE MEASUREMENT AND REINFORCEMENT OF BEHAVIOR OF PSYCHOTICS 1 (1965)Establishing functional speech in echolalic children (1967)A TEST OF CONSUMER DEMAND THEORY USING OBSERVATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL CONSUMER PURCHASES (1973)DYNAMIC CHANGES IN REINFORCER EFFECTIVENESS: THEORETICAL, METHODOLOGICAL, AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH (2003)The Effects of an Abolishing Operation Intervention Component on Play Skills, Challenging Behavior, and Stereotypy (2010)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) (2000)EVALUATION OF A BRIEF MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT IN A NATURALISTIC CONTEXT (2000)Relative preferences for edible and leisure stimuli in children with autism (2018)Assessing preference for types of social interaction (2019)A comparison of methods for assessing preference for social interactions (2020)ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS (1985)TOWARD A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF SELF‐INJURY (1994)EVALUATION OF ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE REINFORCER VALUE USING PROGRESSIVE‐RATIO SCHEDULES (2008)Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application, (1966)ON THE LAW OF EFFECT 1 (1970)Problem Behavior Interventions for Young Children with Autism: A Research Synthesis (2002)EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT (1998)DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN DISCRIMINATIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL FUNCTIONS OF STIMULI (1982)Further evaluation of the multiple-stimulus preference assessment (2000)EVALUATING THE PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF A SINGLE STIMULUS ENGAGEMENT PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT (2001)EXAMINATION OF RELATIVE REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS OF STIMULI IDENTIFIED THROUGH PRETREATMENT AND DAILY BRIEF PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS (2001)ON THE APPLIED USE OF PROGRESSIVE‐RATIO SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT (2008)Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: A review of the literature (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1992A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES1,626 cited
  • 1999RELATIVE VERSUS ABSOLUTE REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS146 cited
  • 1968REINFORCER SAMPLING: A TECHNIQUE FOR INCREASING THE BEHAVIOR OF MENTAL PATIENTS1124 cited
  • 1997DISPLACEMENT OF LEISURE REINFORCERS BY FOOD DURING PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS113 cited
  • 2009ON THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES AND PROGRESSIVE‐RATIO SCHEDULE ASSESSMENTS OF STIMULUS VALUE64 cited
  • 1999ON THE DISPLACEMENT OF LEISURE ITEMS BY FOOD DURING MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS62 cited
  • 2008PREFERENCE FOR REINFORCERS UNDER PROGRESSIVE‐ AND FIXED‐RATIO SCHEDULES: A COMPARISON OF SINGLE AND CONCURRENT ARRANGEMENTS55 cited

Cited by

  • 2012ASSESSING PREFERENCE FOR SOCIAL INTERACTION IN CHILDREN DIAGNOSED WITH AUTISM52 cited
  • 2012CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN SINGLE VERSUS DAILY PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES AND REINFORCER EFFICACY UNDER PROGRESSIVE‐RATIO SCHEDULES39 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work