SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparative Effectiveness Research and Evidence‐Based Health Policy: Experience from Four Countries
1 references·9 citing·39 second hop
Comparative Effectiveness Research and Evidence‐Based Health Policy: Experience from Four Countries (2009)Comparative Effectiveness Research and Ev…National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments (2004)National Institute for Clinic…Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices before approval (2020)Generating comparative eviden…Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices after approval (2020)Generating comparative eviden…New Strategies for Wicked Problems: Science and Solutions in the 21st Century (2017)New Strategies for Wicked Pro…Health Benefit Plans in Latin America: A Regional Comparison (2014)Health Benefit Plans in Latin…Social values in health priority setting: a conceptual framework (2012)Social values in health prior…Systematic Reviews and Health Policy: The Influence of a Project on Perinatal Care since 1988 (2011)Systematic Reviews and Health…Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions (2011)Role of patient and public pa…Health Technology Funding Decision-Making Processes Around the World (2011)Health Technology Funding Dec…Lessons from Abroad (2009)Lessons from AbroadMedical Care Costs: How Much Welfare Loss? (1992)Principles of Good Practice for Budget Impact Analysis: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—Budget Impact Analysis (2007)The quest for universal health coverage: achieving social protection for all in Mexico (2012)Estimating cost-effectiveness thresholds under a managed healthcare system: experiences from Colombia (2021)The role of the private sector in delivering essential packages of health services: lessons from country experiences (2023)Reducing fragmentation of primary healthcare financing for more equitable, people-centred primary healthcare (2025)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Doing Qualitative Research (2017)Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting (2003)Bringing ‘the public’ into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: From principles to practice (2006)Centralized Drug Review Processes In Australia, Canada, New Zealand, And The United Kingdom (2006)Assessing the Added Value of Health Technologies: Reconciling Different Perspectives (2012)Factors and situations influencing the value of patient preference studies along the medical product lifecycle: a literature review (2018)Why Deliberative Democracy? (2004)Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy (2006)Can Global Health Policy be Depoliticized? A Critique of Global Calls for Evidence‐Based Policy (2014)Can the EVIDEM Framework Tackle Issues Raised by Evaluating Treatments for Rare Diseases: Analysis of Issues and Policies, and Context-Specific Adaptation (2015)NICE and Fair? Health Technology Assessment Policy Under the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 1999–2018 (2019)A History of the Present: Uncovering Discourses in (South African) Child Welfare (2009)Using Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness to Make Drug Coverage Decisions (2009)Internationalizing Social Work Education: Models, Methods, and Meanings (2011)How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. (1992)EuroQol: the current state of play (1996)Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values (2001)Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions (2008)Delivering affordable cancer care in high-income countries (2011)Dealing With Medical Practice Variations: A Proposal for Action (1984)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Health inequality and governance in Scotland since 2007 (2013)The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. (1966)Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (1992)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments767 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Social values in health priority setting: a conceptual framework141 cited
  • 2011Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions94 cited
  • 2020Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices after approval87 cited
  • 2011Health Technology Funding Decision-Making Processes Around the World84 cited
  • 2020Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices before approval79 cited
  • 2014Health Benefit Plans in Latin America: A Regional Comparison44 cited
  • 2017New Strategies for Wicked Problems: Science and Solutions in the 21st Century30 cited
  • 2009Lessons from Abroad22 cited
  • 2011Systematic Reviews and Health Policy: The Influence of a Project on Perinatal Care since 198819 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work