Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Why Fallacies Appear to be Better Arguments Than They Are

3 references·12 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1995A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy307 cited
2009Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness197 cited
1995Arguments from ignorance119 cited

Cited by

2013Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries59 cited
2013When and how do we deal with straw men? A normative and cognitive pragmatic account59 cited
2015The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life55 cited
2016Argumentation methods in educational contexts: Introduction to the special issue49 cited
2022Argumentation profiles and the manipulation of common ground. The arguments of populist leaders on Twitter43 cited
2010Argumentation and Reasoning41 cited
2016Rhetoric and cognition30 cited
2014Informal Fallacies as Cognitive Heuristics in Public Health Reasoning27 cited
2015Argumentation, rationality, and psychology of reasoning27 cited
2012Scaring the Public: Fear Appeal Arguments in Public Health Reasoning24 cited
2013Critical thinking and cognitive biases6 cited
2021Do informal reasoning fallacies really shape decisions? Experimental evidence3 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work