SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Afterword: Why Peer Review Journals?
10 references·0 citing·45 second hop
Afterword: Why Peer Review Journals? (2003)Afterword: Why Peer Review Journals?A Tool for Reviewers (2001)A Tool for ReviewersDigital libraries and autonomous citation indexing (1999)Digital libraries and autonom…The invisible hand of peer review (1998)The invisible hand of peer re…CiteSeer (1998)CiteSeerHow Well Does a Journal's Peer Review Process Function? (1994)How Well Does a Journal's Pee…A Citation Analysis of the Impact of Blinded Peer Review (1994)A Citation Analysis of the Im…The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)The Philosophical Basis of Pe…Peer Commentary on Peer Review: A Case Study in Scientific Quality Control (1983)Peer Commentary on Peer Revie…Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Citation Indexing-Its Theory …THE USE OF CITATION DATA IN WRITING THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE (1964)THE USE OF CITATION DATA IN W…Implementing peer review on the net: scientific quality control in scholarly electronic journals (1996)The Economics of Electronic Journals (1997)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals (1983)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)Research Papers: Who's Uncited Now? (1991)Publication and related biases. (2000)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)The History of the Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle (1970)Chase, Chance, and Creativity (1978)The History of Lithium Therapy (1984)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Bias in peer review (2012)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Who Benefits from Peer Review? An Analysis of the Outcome of 100 Requests for Review by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (2005)The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science (2010)A concept for inferring ‘frontier research’ in grant proposals (2013)"Science Citation Index"—A New Dimension in Indexing (1964)Multiple Authorship Trends in Scientific Papers (1964)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)What is an emerging technology? (2015)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)An 'important contribution' or 'tiresome reading'? A study of evaluation in peer reviews of journal article submissions (2004)How to review journal manuscripts: A lesson learnt from the world's excellent reviewers (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals (1995)Interactive deduplication using active learning (2002)Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper (2002)Cited Documents as Concept Symbols (1978)What do citations count? the rhetoric-first model (1989)Collective entity resolution in relational data (2007)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)Sensitivity and Attachment: A Meta-Analysis on Parental Antecedents of Infant Attachment (1997)The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct (2006)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Science policies as principal–agent games (1998)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1980Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities1,651 cited
  • 1998CiteSeer1,088 cited
  • 1999Digital libraries and autonomous citation indexing607 cited
  • 1990The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation436 cited
  • 1964THE USE OF CITATION DATA IN WRITING THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE436 cited
  • 1998The invisible hand of peer review144 cited
  • 1994A Citation Analysis of the Impact of Blinded Peer Review120 cited
  • 1983Peer Commentary on Peer Review: A Case Study in Scientific Quality Control99 cited
  • 1994How Well Does a Journal's Peer Review Process Function?28 cited
  • 2001A Tool for Reviewers27 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work