SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
When Minimal Detectable Change Exceeds a Diagnostic Test–Based Threshold Change Value for an Outcome Measure: Resolving the Conflict
4 references·3 citing·27 second hop
When Minimal Detectable Change Exceeds a Diagnostic Test–Based Threshold Change Value for an Outcome Measure: Resolving the Conflict (2012)When Minimal Detectable Change Exceeds a …The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference (2009)The minimal detectable change…Getting More from the Literature: Estimating the Standard Error of Measurement from Reliability Studies (2004)Getting More from the Literat…Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research (2002)Many faces of the minimal cli…A taxonomy for responsiveness (2001)A taxonomy for responsivenessRevisiting the Concept of Minimal Detectable Change for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (2022)Revisiting the Concept of Min…Understanding Clinical Significance in Rehabilitation (2021)Understanding Clinical Signif…A Rasch-Validated Version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index for Interval-Level Measurement of Upper Extremity Function (2013)A Rasch-Validated Version of …Measurement of health status (1989)Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. (1991)Assessment of Quality-of-Life Outcomes (1996)Current challenges in clinimetrics (2003)Sleep disturbance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation by medical outcomes study and visual analog sleep scales. (2006)Evaluating the responsiveness of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Group and individual level analysis (2012)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. (1992)The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (1992)Minimal important differences for fatigue patient reported outcome measures—a systematic review (2016)Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (2019)Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study (2020)Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests (1961)A Rasch Model for Partial Credit Scoring (1982)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. (1991)Minimal important difference to infer changes in health-related quality of life—a systematic review (2017)Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life (2003)Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes (2007)On the Theory of Scales of Measurement (1946)A Rating Formulation for Ordered Response Categories (1978)Applying the Rasch Model (2015)The Impact of Sample Size on Reliability Metrics Stability in Isokinetic Strength Assessments: Does Size Matter? (2025)When Testing Becomes Learning—Underscoring the Relevance of Habituation to Improve Internal Validity of Common Neurocognitive Tests (2025)Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments (2005)Computerized adaptive test for patients with foot or ankle impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function (2008)Clinical Interpretation of a Lower-Extremity Functional Scale–Derived Computerized Adaptive Test (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research514 cited
  • 2001A taxonomy for responsiveness488 cited
  • 2009The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference356 cited
  • 2004Getting More from the Literature: Estimating the Standard Error of Measurement from Reliability Studies302 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Revisiting the Concept of Minimal Detectable Change for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures65 cited
  • 2013A Rasch-Validated Version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index for Interval-Level Measurement of Upper Extremity Function50 cited
  • 2021Understanding Clinical Significance in Rehabilitation26 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work