SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Identifying observational studies of surgical interventions in MEDLINE and EMBASE
7 references·14 citing·41 second hop
Identifying observational studies of surgical interventions in MEDLINE and EMBASE (2006)Identifying observational studies of surg…How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006)How to identify randomized co…Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey (2005)Optimal search strategies for…Do the findings of case series studies vary significantly according to methodological characteristics? (2005)Do the findings of case serie…Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey (2004)Optimal search strategies for…Evaluation of methodological search filters—a review (2004)Evaluation of methodological …Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Development of a highly sensi…Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)Developing Optimal Search Str…Translation and validation of PubMed and Embase search filters for identification of systematic reviews, intervention studies, and observational studies in the field of first aid (2021)Translation and validation of…Development and validation of study filters for identifying controlled non‐randomized studies in PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE (2020)Development and validation of…Study filters for non-randomized studies of interventions consistently lacked sensitivity upon external validation (2018)Study filters for non-randomi…The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement (2017)The STROBE extensions: protoc…Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 8: identifying quasi-experimental studies to inform systematic reviews (2017)Quasi-experimental study desi…An assessment of the efficacy of searching in biomedical databases beyond MEDLINE in identifying studies for a systematic review on ward closures as an infection control intervention to control outbreaks (2014)An assessment of the efficacy…Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE (2013)Search strategies to identify…Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines (2012)Evaluating the impact and use…Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Finding evidence for comparin…Comprehensive evaluations of the adverse effects of drugs: importance of appropriate study selection and data sources (2011)Comprehensive evaluations of …Developing and testing of search filters for the new European Union Member States’ research (2010)Developing and testing of sea…Disagreement in primary study selection between systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy (2008)Disagreement in primary study…A pragmatic critical appraisal instrument for search filters: introducing the CADTH CAI (2008)A pragmatic critical appraisa…Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in coloproctology: interpretation and potential pitfalls (2007)Systematic reviews and meta‐a…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research (2000)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable? (2015)Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review (2018)Synthesizing Qualitative Research (2018)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Updating comparative effectiveness reviews: Current efforts in AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program (2011)ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study (2013)The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – handbook for qualified systematic reviews (2020)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)The role of case reports in evidence-based practice, with suggestions for improving their reporting (2009)Opportunities and challenges in using studies without a control group in comparative effectiveness reviews (2013)A Practical Guide to Value of Information Analysis (2014)Searching for Studies (2008)Comparison of Pooled Risk Estimates for Adverse Effects from Different Observational Study Designs: Methodological Overview (2013)Overview: comprehensive and carefully constructed strategies are required when conducting searches for adverse effects data (2019)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Model Transparency and Validation (2012)Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. (2015)Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies (2016)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments (2009)2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group (2015)Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2021)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence (2011)Applying machine classifiers to update searches: Analysis from two case studies (2021)Value and Challenges of Using Observational Studies in Systematic Reviews of Public Health Interventions (2022)Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey (2004)Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Model Transparency and Validation: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-7 (2012)Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed833 cited
  • 2006How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on.799 cited
  • 1994Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE763 cited
  • 2004Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey547 cited
  • 2005Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey439 cited
  • 2004Evaluation of methodological search filters—a review202 cited
  • 2005Do the findings of case series studies vary significantly according to methodological characteristics?92 cited

Cited by

  • 2011Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program52 cited
  • 2011Comprehensive evaluations of the adverse effects of drugs: importance of appropriate study selection and data sources49 cited
  • 2020Development and validation of study filters for identifying controlled non‐randomized studies in PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE38 cited
  • 2021Translation and validation of PubMed and Embase search filters for identification of systematic reviews, intervention studies, and observational studies in the field of first aid33 cited
  • 2012Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines33 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2017Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 8: identifying quasi-experimental studies to inform systematic reviews25 cited
  • 2008A pragmatic critical appraisal instrument for search filters: introducing the CADTH CAI24 cited
  • 2014An assessment of the efficacy of searching in biomedical databases beyond MEDLINE in identifying studies for a systematic review on ward closures as an infection control intervention to control outbreaks23 cited
  • 2008Disagreement in primary study selection between systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy23 cited
  • 2017The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement20 cited
  • 2007Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in coloproctology: interpretation and potential pitfalls19 cited
  • 2018Study filters for non-randomized studies of interventions consistently lacked sensitivity upon external validation13 cited
  • 2013Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE12 cited
  • 2010Developing and testing of search filters for the new European Union Member States’ research8 cited