SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Meta-analysis: Can We Mix Apples and Oranges?
16 references·3 citing·29 second hop
Meta-analysis: Can We Mix Apples and Oranges? (2004)Meta-analysis: Can We Mix Apples and Oran…The Cochrane Library (2005)The Cochrane LibraryReported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Reported Methodologic Quality…Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis (2001)Investigating and dealing wit…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Meta-analysis: Principles and…Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Language bias in randomised c…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasAssessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Systematic Review: Why source…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…Como medir e explorar a heterogeneidade de uma meta-análise: Estratégias metodológicas fundamentais (2022)Como medir e explorar a heter…Methodological steps used by authors of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials: a cross-sectional study (2019)Methodological steps used by …Predictors of Mental Health Service Use by Young Adults: A Systematic Review (2016)Predictors of Mental Health S…Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade (2006)The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study (2009)Mortality Rates in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa and Other Eating Disorders (2011)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 1997Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures2,413 cited
  • 2001Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses2,285 cited
  • 2001Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis2,229 cited
  • 2005The Cochrane Library2,035 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 1997

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German
1,029 cited
  • 1994Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated1,016 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2016Predictors of Mental Health Service Use by Young Adults: A Systematic Review55 cited
    • 2019Methodological steps used by authors of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials: a cross-sectional study23 cited
    • 2022Como medir e explorar a heterogeneidade de uma meta-análise: Estratégias metodológicas fundamentais8 cited