Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Need for Large-Scale Randomized Evidence Without Undue Emphasis on Small Trials, Meta-analyses, or Subgroup Analyses

1 references·12 citing·49 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited

Cited by

2015The effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapies: An update250 cited
2016Evidence-based clinical practice: Overview of threats to the validity of evidence and how to minimise them109 cited
2012Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries105 cited
2016Viewpoint: taking into account risks of random errors when analysing multiple outcomes in systematic reviews67 cited
2016Poor agreement in significant findings between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized trials in perioperative medicine58 cited
2016Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted?56 cited
2018Effectiveness of nursing intervention for increasing hope in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis49 cited
2024Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta‐analyses)20 cited
2022Project Rebuild the Evidence Base (REB): a method to interpret randomised clinical trials and their meta-analysis to present solid benefit-risk assessments to patients.15 cited
2013A pragmatic strategy for the review of clinical evidence14 cited
2021Different biases in meta-analyses of case-control and cohort studies: an example from genomics and precision medicine13 cited
2010Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials, Meta-analyses, and Subgroup Analyses

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

11 cited