Collective Memory in a Global Age

Abstract

This article argues that attempts to conceptualize the memory boom in amnesic societies have resulted in a clash between two theoretical stands: the approach which stresses the significance of remembering and the perspective which insists on the value of forgetting. It asserts that neither the value of memory nor the value of forgetting can be taken for granted and argues that any search for possible resolutions to the dialectical relationship between remembering and forgetting should be taken in the interest of cultivating a relationship with the past that enhances societal well-being in the present. Such reasoning leads us to judge the value of cosmopolitan memory in terms of its capacity to shape post-nationalist solidaristic political communities. The acceptance of the need to judge the act of putting the past in the service of the present requires us to question the contrasting projects of cosmopolitan citizenship: one claiming that remembering is vital for sustaining plurality and diversity of a global citizenship, and the other that stresses the importance of forgetting for the emergence of the politics of a global citizenship. After presenting contrasting views on the importance of memory for the development of cosmopolitan citizenship, the article searches for an approach to memory which is better suited to projects that aim to ensure post-nationalistic solidarity and human rights while protecting cultural rights, minority rights and personal identity.

Cite this

Barbara A. Misztal (2010). Collective Memory in a Global Age. Current Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392109348544

@article{a2010collective,
  title  = {Collective Memory in a Global Age},
  author = {Misztal, Barbara A.},
  year   = {2010},
  journal = {Current Sociology},
  doi    = {10.1177/0011392109348544}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 125 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by