SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: Is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed?
10 references·16 citing·50 second hop
Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: Is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed? (2014)Quality assessment of qualitative evidenc…Should We Exclude Inadequately Reported Studies From Qualitative Systematic Reviews? An Evaluation of Sensitivity Analyses in Two Case Study Reviews (2012)Should We Exclude Inadequatel…Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (2012)Enhancing transparency in rep…A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: update on a review of published papers (2012)A move to more systematic and…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research (2011)Evaluating meta-ethnography: …Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Methods for the thematic synt…Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports (2007)Synthesizing qualitative rese…Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Consolidated criteria for rep…Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods (2007)Appraising qualitative resear…Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Realist review - a new method…Experiences of Loneliness Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies (2023)Experiences of Loneliness Acr…“All the fun stuff, the teachers say, ‘that’s dangerous!’” Hearing from children on safety and risk in active play in schools: a systematic review (2022)“All the fun stuff, the teach…The “quality” of JBI qualitative research synthesis: a methodological investigation into the adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance (2021)The “quality” of JBI qualitat…Moving qualitative synthesis research forward in education: A methodological systematic review (2021)Moving qualitative synthesis …Critical appraisal (2021)Critical appraisalThe qualitative evidence behind the factors impacting online learning experiences as informed by the community of inquiry framework: A thematic synthesis (2020)The qualitative evidence behi…Psychedelic Treatments for Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Patient Experiences in Qualitative Studies (2020)Psychedelic Treatments for Ps…Understanding and using patient experiences as evidence in healthcare priority setting (2019)Understanding and using patie…UK parents’ experiences of their child receiving a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence (2019)UK parents’ experiences of th…Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence for environmental policy and management: an overview of different methodological options (2019)Systematic reviews of qualita…Systematic mapping of existing tools to appraise methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative research: first stage in the development of the CAMELOT tool (2019)Systematic mapping of existin…Synthesizing Qualitative Research (2018)Synthesizing Qualitative Rese…Barriers and facilitators to discontinuing antidepressant use: A systematic review and thematic synthesis (2018)Barriers and facilitators to …A Conceptual Framework for Critical Appraisal in Systematic Mixed Studies Reviews (2018)A Conceptual Framework for Cr…Potential value of systematic reviews of qualitative evidence in informing user-centered health and social care: findings from a descriptive overview (2017)Potential value of systematic…An evidence assessment tool for ecosystem services and conservation studies (2016)An evidence assessment tool f…The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (1968)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)How to do a grounded theory study: a worked example of a study of dental practices (2011)COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies) (2014)Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review (2014)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research? (2016)Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review (2016)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review (2014)The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review (2016)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Thematic Analysis (2017)A Realist Theory of Science. (1977)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)62. Realism with a Human Face (2011)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research (2002)Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research (2010)Use of content analysis to conduct knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews (2013)Systems science and systems thinking for public health: a systematic review of the field (2015)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (1986)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)‘Trying to pin down jelly’ - exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography (2013)Using Sandelowski and Barroso’s Meta-Synthesis Method in Advancing Qualitative Evidence (2015)Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review (2017)Evaluative Criteria for Qualitative Research in Health Care: Controversies and Recommendations (2008)Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis (2016)Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups42,389 cited
  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2008Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews9,266 cited
  • 2012Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ3,561 cited
  • 2005Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions3,187 cited
  • 2011Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research619 cited
  • 2007Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods546 cited
  • 2012A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: update on a review of published papers320 cited
  • 2007Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports260 cited
  • 2012Should We Exclude Inadequately Reported Studies From Qualitative Systematic Reviews? An Evaluation of Sensitivity Analyses in Two Case Study Reviews248 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Psychedelic Treatments for Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Patient Experiences in Qualitative Studies223 cited
  • 2018Synthesizing Qualitative Research152 cited
  • 2018A Conceptual Framework for Critical Appraisal in Systematic Mixed Studies Reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

138 cited
  • 2021Critical appraisal116 cited
  • 2020The qualitative evidence behind the factors impacting online learning experiences as informed by the community of inquiry framework: A thematic synthesis106 cited
  • 2018Barriers and facilitators to discontinuing antidepressant use: A systematic review and thematic synthesis90 cited
  • 2019UK parents’ experiences of their child receiving a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence88 cited
  • 2019Understanding and using patient experiences as evidence in healthcare priority setting86 cited
  • 2023Experiences of Loneliness Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies67 cited
  • 2016An evidence assessment tool for ecosystem services and conservation studies64 cited
  • 2019Systematic mapping of existing tools to appraise methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative research: first stage in the development of the CAMELOT tool61 cited
  • 2022“All the fun stuff, the teachers say, ‘that’s dangerous!’” Hearing from children on safety and risk in active play in schools: a systematic review61 cited
  • 2019Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence for environmental policy and management: an overview of different methodological options58 cited
  • 2021The “quality” of JBI qualitative research synthesis: a methodological investigation into the adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance55 cited
  • 2017Potential value of systematic reviews of qualitative evidence in informing user-centered health and social care: findings from a descriptive overview52 cited
  • 2021Moving qualitative synthesis research forward in education: A methodological systematic review49 cited