SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The European Heart Journal on the move: can scientific publishing be further improved?
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
The European Heart Journal on the move: can scientific publishing be further improved? (2012)The European Heart Journal on the move: c…The best of the European Heart Journal: look back with pride (2012)The best of the European Hear…Moving from impact to influence: measurement and the changing role of medical journals (2012)Moving from impact to influen…The Validity of Peer Review in a General Medicine Journal (2011)The Validity of Peer Review i…Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Retracted Science and the Ret…Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)Can Tweets Predict Citations?…Happy birthday European Heart Journal: in 30 years, from Cinderella to centre stage (2010)Happy birthday European Heart…Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care? (2010)Editorial Peer Reviewers' Rec…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…The European Heart Journal goes global: the road ahead of the editorial team 2009-2011 (2008)The European Heart Journal go…The history of the peer-review process (2002)The history of the peer-revie…Masking Author Identity in Peer Review (1998)Masking Author Identity in Pe…Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality? (1998)Does Masking Author Identity …Anonymity of reviewers (1994)Anonymity of reviewersAnonymity of reviewers - Editorial comment (1994)Anonymity of reviewers - Edit…The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)The Evolution of Editorial Pe…Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Peer Review in 18th-Century S…THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN (1951)Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers (1979)Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)The ups and downs of peer review (2007)Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes: The Case of Interaction Research (2011)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature (2016)Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. (1999)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review (1994)Evidence on peer review—scientific quality control or smokescreen? (1999)Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities (2013)Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study (2014)Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates (1988)Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. (2005)Emerging trends in peer review—a survey (2015)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status (1989)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Grant Peer Review: Improving Inter-Rater Reliability with Training (2015)The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors (2015)The quality of systematic reviews/meta‐analyses published in the field of bariatrics: A cross‐sectional systematic survey using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS (2020)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Exploratory Research (2020)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. (2014)Misinformation in and about science (2021)Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2011Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact1,085 cited
  • 2002The history of the peer-review process445 cited
  • 2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index405 cited
  • 1990Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism350 cited
  • 1990The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review346 cited
  • 1998Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?278 cited
  • 2010Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?177 cited
  • 1998Masking Author Identity in Peer Review104 cited
  • 2011The Validity of Peer Review in a General Medicine Journal72 cited
  • 1994Anonymity of reviewers41 cited
  • 2012Moving from impact to influence: measurement and the changing role of medical journals41 cited
  • 2008The European Heart Journal goes global: the road ahead of the editorial team 2009-201126 cited
  • 2010Happy birthday European Heart Journal: in 30 years, from Cinderella to centre stage17 cited
  • 2012The best of the European Heart Journal: look back with pride

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

12 cited
  • 1994Anonymity of reviewers - Editorial comment8 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.