The analysis of efficiency among a small number of organisations: How inferences can be improved by exploiting patient‐level data

Abstract

Those responsible for monitoring and managing the performance of health-care organisations face the common problem that the relationship between observed performance and effort is difficult to establish. A solution is to compare the performance of multiple organisations, but this requires a sufficient number of comparators. Faced with a small sample, it may be possible to exploit other information sources. Multilevel regression models are applied to analyse the performance of six Danish vascular departments in 2004 using a patient-level data set. We find that treatment costs are higher for smokers, older patients, patients with cerebrovascular and pulmonal diseases and for those subject to acute hospitalisation and with longer lengths of stay. Costs are lower for patients who are having follow-up surgery and for patients who receive some form of home care, suggesting that there may be some substitution of care input between vascular departments and other care providers. We estimate the relative efficiency of each department. The construction of confidence intervals allows the six departments to be sorted into two groups containing the least and most efficient departments. Conclusions about relative efficiency are robust to model specification, choice of estimator and hold at the 95% confidence level.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 36 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.