Strategy disclosure in annual reports across Europe: a study on differences between five countries

Sicco C. Santema · Marijke Hoekert · Jeroen van de Rijt · Aswin van Oijen

89 citations0/0 files storedEuropean Business Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Organizational Strategy and Culture

Abstract

Purpose This article aims to focus on strategy disclosure in annual reports across Europe and to try to establish whether national culture and national corporate governance features have an influence on the extent to which companies disclose their strategy. The research was conducted to fulfil three main purposes: to build a model for measuring strategy disclosure; to find reasons for differences in strategy disclosure across countries; and to test whether there are indeed differences in the extent to which strategy is disclosed. Design/methodology/approach The extent to which companies disclose their strategy is predicted on the basis of comparative management and corporate governance literature. This prediction is subsequently tested on ten criteria (describing corporate strategy). The empirical results were statistically analysed by using Manova and linear regression. Findings The main conclusion is drawn that national differences in corporate governance and culture do influence the extent to which companies disclose their corporate strategy. Research limitations/implications The research sample consists of the annual reports of five European countries. Future research could be extended into a broader sample. Furthermore, possible influence of other elements on the extent to which companies disclose their strategy (besides the control variables already taken into account) could be considered. Practical implications Practical implications for managers from this conclusion are that, in order to keep the stakeholders satisfied, the company should look at their demands for disclosure when deciding on a strategy for disclosure. Originality/value The link between national differences and strategy disclosure has not been specified so clearly in the literature before, and therefore can be seen as the largest contribution of this study.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 89 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Corporate Ownership Around the World 1987The Concept of Corporate Strategy 1983Organization Theory and Design 1983The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories 1997Exploring corporate strategy 1980Defining the Business: The Starting Point of Strategic Planning 1996THE INFORMATION CONTENT OF THE PRESIDENT'S LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS 2002Communicative Action and Corporate Annual Reports

Cited by

2012Impact of Corporate Governance on Social and Environmental Information Disclosure of Malaysian Listed Banks: Panel Data Analysis 2021Non‐financial strategy disclosure and environmental, social and governance score: Insight from a configurational approach 2023Do environmental scores become multinational corporations' strategic “greenwashing” tool for window‐dressing carbon reduction? A cross‐cultural analysis 2014National cultural dimensions in finance and accounting scholarship: An important gap in the literatures?2022Does national culture matter for environmental innovation? A study of emerging economies

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.