Evaluating the effect of neighbourhood weight matrices on smoothing properties of Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) models

Arul Earnest · Geoffrey Gerard Morgan · Kerrie Lee Mengersen · LOUISE M. RYAN · Richard J. Summerhayes · John Beard

100 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Health Geographics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Spatial and Panel Data Analysis Statistical Methods in Epidemiology demographic modeling and climate adaptation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) model is widely used in many small-area ecological studies to analyse outcomes measured at an areal level. There has been little evaluation of the influence of different neighbourhood weight matrix structures on the amount of smoothing performed by the CAR model. We examined this issue in detail. METHODS: We created several neighbourhood weight matrices and applied them to a large dataset of births and birth defects in New South Wales (NSW), Australia within 198 Statistical Local Areas. Between the years 1995-2003, there were 17,595 geocoded birth defects and 770,638 geocoded birth records with available data. Spatio-temporal models were developed with data from 1995-2000 and their fit evaluated within the following time period: 2001-2003. RESULTS: We were able to create four adjacency-based weight matrices, seven distance-based weight matrices and one matrix based on similarity in terms of a key covariate (i.e. maternal age). In terms of agreement between observed and predicted relative risks, categorised in epidemiologically relevant groups, generally the distance-based matrices performed better than the adjacency-based neighbourhoods. In terms of recovering the underlying risk structure, the weight-7 model (smoothing by maternal-age 'Covariate model') was able to correctly classify 35/47 high-risk areas (sensitivity 74%) with a specificity of 47%, and the 'Gravity' model had sensitivity and specificity values of 74% and 39% respectively. CONCLUSION: We found considerable differences in the smoothing properties of the CAR model, depending on the type of neighbours specified. This in turn had an effect on the models' ability to recover the observed risk in an area. Prior to risk mapping or ecological modelling, an exploratory analysis of the neighbourhood weight matrix to guide the choice of a suitable weight matrix is recommended. Alternatively, the weight matrix can be chosen a priori based on decision-theoretic considerations including loss, cost and inferential aims.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 100 citations exist upstream.

References

1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales 1995Journal of the American Statistical Association 2022Environmental Health Perspectives at 50 2014Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 2004Interpreting Posterior Relative Risk Estimates in Disease-Mapping Studies 2005A comparison of Bayesian spatial models for disease mapping 1995Bayesian analysis of space—time variation in disease risk 2001Statistical Methods in Spatial Epidemiology

Cited by

2017Spatial smoothing in Bayesian models: a comparison of weights matrix specifications and their impact on inference 2017Urban–rural inequalities in suicide mortality: a comparison of urbanicity indicators

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.