SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scientific Journals are 'faith based': is there sciencebehind Peer review?
2 references·4 citing·32 second hop
Scientific Journals are 'faith based': is there sciencebehind Peer review? (2006)Scientific Journals are 'faith based': is…Papyrus to PowerPoint (P 2 P): metamorphosis of scientific communication (2002)Papyrus to PowerPoint (P 2 P)…Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Effects of Editorial Peer Rev…The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on the External Review of Scientific Manuscripts and Editorial Peer Review Processes (2024)The Impact of Generative Arti…Manuscript review continuing medical education: a retrospective investigation of the learning outcomes from this peer reviewer benefit (2020)Manuscript review continuing …Speaking of gender bias (2019)Speaking of gender biasThe Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process (2009)The Air We Breathe: A Critica…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (1964)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)A review of the review process: manuscript peer-review in biomedical research (2009)The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science (2010)Maintaining Live Discussion in Two-Stage Open Peer Review (2012)Statistical Quality Control (1990)Evidence on peer review—scientific quality control or smokescreen? (1999)Mixing journal, article, and author citations, and other pitfalls in the bibliographic impact factor (2003)Bibliometric Research in Occupational Health (2008)Sanctioned Inequity and Accessibility Issues in the Grey Literature in the United States (2010)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review (2007)The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals (2019)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1984)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Gender-based pairings influence cooperative expectations and behaviours (2020)RETRACTED ARTICLE: The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance (2020)The Use of a Cooperative-Learning Activity with University Students: A Gender Experience (2020)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey (2006)Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. (2014)A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review (2021)AI-assisted peer review (2021)ChatGPT is bullshit (2024)The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Research Integrity in Scholarly Publishing (2024)Large language models in peer review: challenges and opportunities (2025)Evaluation of Large Language Models for Peer Review in Transplantation Research: Algorithm Validation Study (2026)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Effects of Editorial Peer Review347 cited
  • 2002Papyrus to PowerPoint (P 2 P): metamorphosis of scientific communication49 cited

Cited by

  • 2009The Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process85 cited
  • 2019Speaking of gender bias32 cited
  • 2024The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on the External Review of Scientific Manuscripts and Editorial Peer Review Processes16 cited
  • 2020Manuscript review continuing medical education: a retrospective investigation of the learning outcomes from this peer reviewer benefit8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work