Form and meaning in morphology: the case of Dutch ‘agent nouns’

Abstract

Some morphologists have proposed the separation of form and meaning in morphology because of the lack of a one-to-one correspondence between them.In this paper it is shown that this position is ill-advised since it impedes a deeper insight into the systematics of the interpretation of complex words.This is demonstrated by a detailed study of one affix, the déverbal suffix -er in Dutch, which creates subject names.The apparent polysemy of this suffix appears to follow from independent, nonlinguistic principles.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 166 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.