No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Sirs—Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanics in the US are poorer and less educated, and yet they enjoy a lower all-cause mortality rate. This so-called ‘Hispanic Paradox’ has received much attention over the past 20 years, both in the epidemiological and demographic literature. Besides artefactual explanations (i.e. possible under-reporting of Hispanic deaths on death certificates), competing theories fall into two categories: the ‘salmon bias hypothesis’, according to which migrants are likely to return to their country of origin after they retire or become seriously ill, and, the ‘healthy migrant hypothesis’, according to which those who migrate and remain in the host country are the healthiest and strongest members of their population of origin. To date, two reviews have documented extensively the wealth of literature on the Hispanic paradox. One, which is very critical of the concept, focuses on low birthweight and infant mortality;1 the other, which is relatively supportive, covers all the different health components involved in the paradox (mortality, infant mortality, violence, AIDS, coronary heart disease, stroke, cancer, and diabetes).2 The first concludes that the evidence supporting the paradox is fragile and highlights the potential role of selective processes in explaining the migrants’ advantage, while the second puts forward the complexity of the picture, with variations by age, gender, type of Hispanic group, degree of acculturation, and specific disease or cause of death.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 102 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.