SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peer Reviewing E-Learning: Opportunities, Challenges, and Solutions
5 references·4 citing·42 second hop
Peer Reviewing E-Learning: Opportunities, Challenges, and Solutions (2007)Peer Reviewing E-Learning: Opportunities,…Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Effects of Editorial Peer Rev…Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Peer Review in Health SciencesWhat Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)What Makes a Good Reviewer an…Effect of Attendance at a Training Session on Peer Reviewer Quality and Performance (1998)Effect of Attendance at a Tra…Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate (1997)Scholarship Assessed: Evaluat…Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback (2020)Learning to improve the quali…Double-blind peer review of manuscripts: opportunities, challenges, and way forward (2020)Double-blind peer review of m…Genre-based writing instruction blended with an online writing tutorial system for the development of academic writing (2018)Genre-based writing instructi…Social WorkersCane-Learn: Evaluation of a Pilot Post-Qualifying e-Learning Course in Research Methods and Critical Appraisal Skills for Social Workers (2009)Social WorkersCane-Learn: Eva…Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review (2007)The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals (2019)Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial (2000)Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts (1998)Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance (1998)Effect of Written Feedback by Editors on Quality of Reviews (2002)Differences in Editorial Board Reviewer Behavior Based on Gender (2010)Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial (2012)Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work (2001)E-Moderating (2004)THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF WEB‐BASED AND CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION: A META‐ANALYSIS (2006)The Use of E-Learning in Social Work Education (2015)How to Teach Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work: A Systematic Review (2019)Pandemic, social distancing, and social work education: students’ satisfaction with online education in Vietnam (2020)Genre analysis : English in academic and research settings. By John M. Swales (Cambridge applied linguistics series.) Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Pp. 260. Cloth $34.50, paper $15.95. (1993)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)The Content Analysis Guidebook (2017)Learning Effect in a Multilingual Web-Based Argumentative Writing Instruction Model, Called ECM, on Metacognition, Rhetorical Moves, and Self-Efficacy for Scientific Purposes (2021)A preliminary study on flipping an English as a foreign language collaborative writing course with video clips: Its impact on writing skills and writing motivation (2022)Triple Method Approach to Development of a Genre-Based Approach to Teaching ESL/EFL Writing: A Systematic Literature Review by Bibliometric, Content, and Scientometric Analyses (2023)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Bias in peer review (2012)Investigating strategies to increase general education teachers' adherence to evidence-based social-emotional behavior practices: A meta-analysis of the single-case literature (2021)The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (2006)The Power of Feedback (2007)Focus on Formative Feedback (2008)The bilateral benefits of providing and receiving peer feedback in academic writing across varying L2 proficiency (2023)Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis (2007)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 1—Eliciting Concepts for a New PRO Instrument (2011)Scholarship of Teaching: A model (2000)Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality (2006)A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate849 cited
  • 2002Effects of Editorial Peer Review347 cited
  • 1999Peer Review in Health Sciences268 cited
  • 1998What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?266 cited
  • 1998Effect of Attendance at a Training Session on Peer Reviewer Quality and Performance78 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback51 cited
  • 2009Social WorkersCane-Learn: Evaluation of a Pilot Post-Qualifying e-Learning Course in Research Methods and Critical Appraisal Skills for Social Workers35 cited
  • 2018Genre-based writing instruction blended with an online writing tutorial system for the development of academic writing29 cited
  • 2020Double-blind peer review of manuscripts: opportunities, challenges, and way forward13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work