SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Heterogeneity in meta-analyses of treatment of acute postoperative pain: a review
11 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Heterogeneity in meta-analyses of treatment of acute postoperative pain: a review (2013)Heterogeneity in meta-analyses of treatme…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)AMSTAR is a reliable and vali…The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal* (2007)The quality of reports of cri…Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests (2002)Exploring sources of heteroge…Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998 (2001)Quality of Cochrane reviews: …An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data (2000)An evaluation of homogeneity …Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Methodology and Reports of Sy…Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: Why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away (1997)Of apples and oranges, file d…Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Systematic Review: Why source…Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Res…Heterogeneity of studies in anesthesiology systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological review and proposal for evidence mapping (2017)Heterogeneity of studies in a…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)Socioeconomic Inequalities in Depression: A Meta-Analysis (2003)Long-term mental health of war-refugees: a systematic literature review (2015)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (2000)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Religion/spirituality and adolescent health outcomes: a review (2006)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT (2007)On the costs and benefits of emotional labor: A meta-analysis of three decades of research. (2011)A meta-analysis and model of the relationship between sleep and depression in adolescents: Recommendations for future research and clinical practice (2014)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review (2014)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Can meta-analyses be trusted? (1991)Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis (1998)An initial meta-analysis of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for treating substance use disorders (2015)Meta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide (2019)A meta-analysis of signaling principle in multimedia learning environments (2020)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy (2005)Metandi: Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression (2009)A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression (2014)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)THE FILE-DRAWER PROBLEM REVISITED: A GENERAL WEIGHTED METHOD FOR CALCULATING FAIL-SAFE NUMBERS IN META-ANALYSIS (2005)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine. (2005)High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews (2005)Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four‐item checklist (2017)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration10,571 cited
  • 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
  • 1987Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research1,267 cited
  • 1994Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated1,016 cited
  • 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
  • 2002Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests446 cited
  • 1997Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: Why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away334 cited
  • 2000An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data278 cited
  • 2001Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998159 cited
  • 2007The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal*112 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Heterogeneity of studies in anesthesiology systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological review and proposal for evidence mapping12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work