Enhancing centralized enforcement of EU law: Pandoras Toolbox?

Roland Bieber · Francesco Maiani

90 citations0/0 files storedCommon Market Law Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

European and International Law Studies European Union Policy and Governance European Law and Migration

Abstract

State compliance with EU Law is crucial to the very existence of the Union. Traditionally, it has been secured through a combination of strong "private" and of weak "centralized" enforcement. However, this arrangement is no longer perceived to be sufficient. By endowing the Union with new tools vis-à-vis its Member States - penalties, conditionality, and the like - current reforms try to complement symbolic sanctioning with real "consequences". The goal is to reinforce the authority of EU Law. In this article, we question whether the new toolbox is fit for the purpose, or whether it risks to produce adverse effects which might even go as far as upsetting the Union's constitutional template.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 90 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2020The EU Law of Economic and Monetary Union 2019State aid control in the modernisation era: Moving towards a differentiated administrative integration?

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.