SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A study of the publishing activity of astronomers since 1969
9 references·1 citing·32 second hop
A study of the publishing activity of astronomers since 1969 (1991)A study of the publishing activity of ast…What Happens to Rejected Astronomical Papers? (1988)What Happens to Rejected Astr…Postwar growth in the length of astronomical and other scientific papers (1984)Postwar growth in the length …Citations to Single and Multiauthored Papers (1984)Citations to Single and Multi…At what Ages did Outstanding American Astronomers Publish Their Most-Cited Papers (1983)At what Ages did Outstanding …Some Trends in American Astronomical Publications (1981)Some Trends in American Astro…Long-Term Citation Histories of Astronomical Papers (1981)Long-Term Citation Histories …The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Matthew effect in science…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew Effect in ScienceThe frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)The frequency distribution of…Going beyond journal classification for evaluation of research outputs (2005)Going beyond journal classifi…Assessing basic research (1983)Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985 (1989)The Scientific Wealth of Nations (1997)The sex and ethnicity or national origins of researchers in astronomy and oncology in four countries, 2006–2007 and 2011–2012 (2013)Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings? (1991)Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review (1991)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)Rejection Rates for Journals Publishing in the Atmospheric Sciences (2010)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery (1961)The Scientific Community. (1966)Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy (1986)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Publication patterns of Turkish astronomers (1996)Scientometrics of big science: a case study of research in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (2010)Prominent institutions in international collaboration network in astronomy and astrophysics (2013)Hubble Space TelescopeScience Metrics (2004)Regularity in the time-dependent distribution of the percentage of never-cited papers: An empirical pilot study based on the six journals (2013)A vector for measuring obsolescence of scientific articles (2016)International Stem Cell Collaboration: How Disparate Policies between the United States and the United Kingdom Impact Research (2011)Bibliometric profile of top-cited single-author articles in the Science Citation Index Expanded (2014)Co-authorship, Homophily, and Scholarly Influence in Information Systems Research (2015)Quantitative studies of science a current bibliography (1983)Death comes as the end — Effects of cessation of personal influence upon rates of citation of astronomical papers (1986)A generation of astronomical telescopes, their users, and publications (2009)A Study of the Publishing Activity of Astronomers since 1969 (1987)Using clustering strategies for creating authority files (2000)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)What is research collaboration? (1997)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1968The Matthew Effect in Science6,700 cited
  • 1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.4,791 cited
  • 1926The frequency distribution of scientific productivity2,266 cited
  • 1988What Happens to Rejected Astronomical Papers?50 cited
  • 1984Citations to Single and Multiauthored Papers46 cited
  • 1981Long-Term Citation Histories of Astronomical Papers39 cited
  • 1981Some Trends in American Astronomical Publications26 cited
  • 1983At what Ages did Outstanding American Astronomers Publish Their Most-Cited Papers20 cited
  • 1984Postwar growth in the length of astronomical and other scientific papers14 cited

Cited by

  • 2005Going beyond journal classification for evaluation of research outputs8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work