SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Cochrane Skin Group
8 references·5 citing·42 second hop
The Cochrane Skin Group (1998)The Cochrane Skin GroupMeta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies (1998)Meta-analysis Spurious precis…meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)meta-analysis bias in locatio…The Cochrane Collaboration. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care (1995)The Cochrane Collaboration. P…Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifyi…Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of T…A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)A comparison of results of me…An Evaluation of Method Reporting and Use in Clinical Trials in Dermatology (1985)An Evaluation of Method Repor…The Cochrane Skin Group: a vanguard for developing and promoting evidence‐based dermatology (2013)The Cochrane Skin Group: a va…The Cochrane Skin Group: Promoting the Best Evidence (2005)The Cochrane Skin Group: Prom…Prospective Clinical Trial Registration (2005)Prospective Clinical Trial Re…What is the point of databases of reviews for dermatology if all they compile is “insufficient evidence”? (2004)What is the point of database…How Can Hand Searching the Dermatological Literature Benefit People With Skin Problems? (2001)How Can Hand Searching the De…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature? (2000)How prominent are patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of dermatological treatments? (2008)Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Effect of Patient Reminder/Recall Interventions on Immunization Rates (2000)Uses and abuses of meta-analysis (2001)Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research (2010)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)Assessing Reports of Therapeutic Trials (1970)Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials (1982)An evaluation of the quality of therapeutic studies in perinatal medicine (1983)Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products (2009)Cars, CONSORT 2010, and Clinical Practice (2010)Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)The Kappa Statistic: A Second Look (2004)The Increasing Importance of Systematic Reviews in Clinical Dermatology Research and Publication (2006)Bibliometric characteristics of systematic reviews in dermatology: A cross-sectional study through Web of Science and Scopus (2015)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Collaborative Care for Depression (2006)Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? (2015)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic review (2003)A systematic review of mental disorder, suicide, and deliberate self harm in lesbian, gay and bisexual people (2008)Association of Torture and Other Potentially Traumatic Events With Mental Health Outcomes Among Populations Exposed to Mass Conflict and Displacement (2009)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews1,677 cited
  • 1992A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction1,517 cited
  • 1998meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies1,370 cited
  • 1992Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction1,138 cited
  • 1998Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies997 cited
  • 1995The Cochrane Collaboration. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care373 cited
  • 1985An Evaluation of Method Reporting and Use in Clinical Trials in Dermatology35 cited

Cited by

  • 2001How Can Hand Searching the Dermatological Literature Benefit People With Skin Problems?25 cited
  • 2004What is the point of databases of reviews for dermatology if all they compile is “insufficient evidence”?21 cited
  • 2005The Cochrane Skin Group: Promoting the Best Evidence11 cited
  • 2005Prospective Clinical Trial Registration8 cited
  • 2013The Cochrane Skin Group: a vanguard for developing and promoting evidence‐based dermatology7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work