Automatic and Flexible: The Case of Nonconscious Goal Pursuit

Abstract

Arguing from the nature of goal pursuit and from the economy of mental resources this paper suggests that automatic goal pursuit, much like its controlled counterpart, may be flexible. Two studies that employ goal priming procedures examine this hypothesis using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Study 1) and a variation of the Iowa Gambling Task (Study 2). Implications of the results for our understanding of the dichotomy between automatic and controlled processes in general, and for our conception of automatic goal pursuit in particular, are discussed.

Cite this

Ran R. Hassin, John A. Bargh, Shira Cohen‐Zimerman (2009). Automatic and Flexible: The Case of Nonconscious Goal Pursuit. Social Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.1.20

@article{r2009automatic,
  title  = {Automatic and Flexible: The Case of Nonconscious Goal Pursuit},
  author = {Hassin, Ran R. and Bargh, John A. and Cohen‐Zimerman, Shira},
  year   = {2009},
  journal = {Social Cognition},
  doi    = {10.1521/soco.2009.27.1.20}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 152 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by