Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Recommendations for reporting randomized controlled trials of herbal interventions: explanation and elaboration

11 references·16 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
2001PubMed Central: creating an Aladdin's cave of ideas670 cited
2006Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials of Herbal Interventions: An Elaborated CONSORT Statement606 cited
1996Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions436 cited
1997Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence262 cited

Cited by

2016Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014167 cited
2015CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: Explanation and elaboration

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

154 cited

2015CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: explanation and elaboration143 cited

2015CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement142 cited

2009The REFLECT statement: Methods and processes of creating Reporting Guidelines For Randomized Controlled Trials for livestock and food safety139 cited

2010The REFLECT Statement: Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in Livestock and Food Safety: Explanation and Elaboration97 cited

2010The REFLECT Statement: Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in Livestock and Food Safety: Explanation and Elaboration93 cited

2015Updated clinical evidence of Chinese herbal medicine for insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials87 cited

2009The REFLECT Statement: Methods and Processes of Creating Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials for Livestock and Food Safety82 cited

2006Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials of Herbal Medicine Interventions77 cited

2010The REFLECT Statement: Methods and Processes of Creating Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials for Livestock and Food Safety by Modifying the CONSORT Statement71 cited

2011Randomized controlled trials of herbal interventions underreport important details of the intervention38 cited

2010The reporting quality, scientific rigor, and ethics of randomized placebo-controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine compound formulations and the differences between Chinese and non-Chinese trials33 cited

2013Quality and Risk of Bias inPanax ginsengRandomized Controlled Trials: A Review32 cited

2008Applying the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) to studies of mental health provision for juvenile offenders: a research note30 cited

2019Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extensions covered most types of randomized controlled trials, but the potential workload for authors was high24 cited