Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?

Peter Groenewegen · Peter M. M. Spreeuwenberg

2,090 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Epidemiology & Community Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Urban Green Space and Health Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies Health disparities and outcomes

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To investigate the strength of the relation between the amount of green space in people's living environment and their perceived general health. This relation is analysed for different age and socioeconomic groups. Furthermore, it is analysed separately for urban and more rural areas, because the strength of the relation was expected to vary with urbanity. DESIGN: The study includes 250 782 people registered with 104 general practices who filled in a self administered form on sociodemographic background and perceived general health. The percentage of green space (urban green space, agricultural space, natural green space) within a one kilometre and three kilometre radius around the postal code coordinates was calculated for each household. METHODS: Multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed at three levels-that is, individual level, family level, and practice level-controlled for sociodemographic characteristics. MAIN RESULTS: The percentage of green space inside a one kilometre and a three kilometre radius had a significant relation to perceived general health. The relation was generally present at all degrees of urbanity. The overall relation is somewhat stronger for lower socioeconomic groups. Elderly, youth, and secondary educated people in large cities seem to benefit more from presence of green areas in their living environment than other groups in large cities. CONCLUSIONS: This research shows that the percentage of green space in people's living environment has a positive association with the perceived general health of residents. Green space seems to be more than just a luxury and consequently the development of green space should be allocated a more central position in spatial planning policy.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2,090 citations exist upstream.

References

1984View Through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery 2014Nature and Health 2003Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings 2002Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity A review 2000Social Cohesion, Social Capital, and Health 2003Social Capital and the Built Environment: The Importance of Walkable Neighborhoods 2002Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable green spaces 2003Natural Environments—Healthy Environments? An Exploratory Analysis of the Relationship between Greenspace and Health

Cited by

2014Nature and Health 2017Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance 2010A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments 2008Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study 2010What is the Best Dose of Nature and Green Exercise for Improving Mental Health? A Multi-Study Analysis

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.