Examining the Effects of Prevention Programs on the Incidence of New Cases of Mental Disorders: The Lack of Statistical Power

Pim J. Cuijpers

217 citations0/0 files storedAmerican Journal of Psychiatry

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Mental Health Treatment and Access Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In the past few decades about 1,000 controlled studies have examined the effects of mental health prevention programs, but few studies have examined the effects of such programs on the incidence of new cases of mental disorders defined according to diagnostic criteria. A major reason why so few studies have examined this important question is that very large numbers of subjects are needed to provide sufficient statistical power for these studies. In this article this power problem is explored. METHOD: Power calculations are presented for studies examining universal prevention (aimed at the general population regardless of risk status), selective prevention (aimed at high-risk groups), and indicated prevention (aimed at subjects who have some symptoms of a disorder without meeting full diagnostic criteria). RESULTS: Studies examining universal prevention are hardly feasible, as the number of subjects required amounts to tens of thousands at least. Research examining selective prevention is more feasible, but the number of subjects needed for these studies is still very high. Studies of indicated prevention are possible. Three major studies of indicated prevention examining the effects on the incidence of new cases of mental disorders are described. CONCLUSIONS: There are several strategies for increasing statistical power in prevention studies: 1) focus on high-incidence groups (by concentrating on indicated prevention, by targeting high-risk groups with multiple risk factors, by targeting groups with multiple disorders), 2) strengthen the effects of prevention programs, and 3) make more efficient use of other trials through cumulative meta-analyses.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 217 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Lifetime and 12-Month Prevalence of DSM-III-R Psychiatric Disorders in the United States 1994Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders 2002Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)1990Depression, Disability Days, and Days Lost From Work in a Prospective Epidemiologic Survey 1997Primary Prevention Mental Health Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Meta‐Analytic Review 1995Targeted Prevention of Unipolar Depressive Disorder in an At-Risk Sample of High School Adolescents: A Randomized Trial of a Group Cognitive Intervention 2001A Randomized Trial of a Group Cognitive Intervention for Preventing Depression in Adolescent Offspring of Depressed Parents 1997Prevention and early intervention for anxiety disorders: A controlled trial.

Cited by

2006Opportunities for cost-effective prevention of late-life depression: an epidemiological approach.2016Prevention of eating disorders: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials 2005Preventing the Incidence of New Cases of Mental Disorders 2010Short Sleep Duration in Prevalent and Persistent Psychological Distress in Young Adults: The DRIVE Study

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.