No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
In the Eighteenth Brumaire, Marx pursues a double strategy: history is represented, on the one hand, as a catastrophic decline from Napoleon to Louis Bonaparte; while on the other, this ‘debased’ repetition is depicted as unsettling the notion of a heroic past. Napoleon I can now be read back through his nephew: his ghost is reawakened, but as a caricature. Yet caricature, parody, satire, and farce were far from negative forms for Marx. They were indeed the necessary forms of representation in a society where ‘an epic … can no longer be written’. In the Eighteenth Brumaire, Marx developed a brilliant if unsystematic account of literary and political representation and of repetition as the unsettling of origins. He did this, above all, through a direct and indirect rereading of Hamlet as parody or farce, in which the dead father is rewritten as an ‘old mole’.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 34 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.