Humanistic Psychology and Animal Rights: Reconsidering the Boundaries of the Humanistic Ethic

Abstract

Speciesism, discrimination against others based on membership in a species, is an ideology in which countless animals are sacrificed for human ends. This system may be supported by a set of problematic psychosocial processes that are detrimental to humans and nonhumans. Psychology, as the field that seeks to understand human motivation and helps define the parameters of social values and normative behavior, may be in a position to challenge the speciesist status quo. Specifically, humanistic psychology, with its emphasis on authenticity, personal integrity, social responsibility, ethics, empathy, and democracy, seems naturally poised to embrace a nonspeciesist, animal rights perspective. However, virtually all psychological paradigms seem to sanction speciesism. This article explores the speciesist underpinnings of psychological thought and suggests a new paradigm that embraces many humanistic values with which to appreciate the role of other animals in human psychology and ontology and to work toward a more nonviolent social order.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.