Individual differences in infant orienting and autonomic conditioning

Eben M. Ingram · Hiram E. Fitzgerald

29 citations0/0 files storedDevelopmental Psychobiology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Child and Animal Learning Development Memory and Neural Mechanisms Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Abstract

Abstract Conditioned discrimination and discrimination reversal of the skin potential response was attempted and subsequently demonstrated in 3‐month‐old infants. Analysis of individual subject data indicated individual differences in conditionability, as well as a significant relation between orienting response magnitude and conditionability. In general, high‐magnitude orienters discriminated; low‐magnitude orienters did not. Behavioral ratings of state, sex of subject, and stimulus order were not related to orienting or to conditionability.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.

References

1972The Psychophysiological Nature of Introversion—Extraversion: A Modification of Eysenck's Theory 1972Conditioning, Introversion—Extraversion and the Strength of the Nervous System 1969Development of the Sensory Analyzers During Infancy

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.