Virtue, In Context

Daniel H. Cohen

26 citations0/0 files storedInformal Logic

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Philosophical Ethics and Theory Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Abstract

Virtue argumentation theory provides the best framework for accommodating the notion of an argument that is “fully satisfying” in a robust and integrated sense. The process of explicating the notion of fully satisfying arguments requires expanding the concept of arguers to include all of an argument’s participants, including judges, juries, and interested spectators. And that, in turn, requires expanding the concept of an argument itself to include its entire context.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

1996Virtues of the Mind 2003The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding 2004The value of knowledge and the pursuit of understanding 1980The Raft and the Pyramid 1999Agent Reliabilism 2009Virtue in Argument 1991The raft and the pyramid: coherence versus foundations in the theory of knowledge 1985In Defence of Open-Mindedness

Cited by

2015Bogency and Goodacies: On Argument Quality in Virtue Argumentation Theory 2016Introduction: Virtues and Arguments 2015On the Priority of Agent-Based Argumentative Norms 2018The attraction of the ideal has no traction on the real: on adversariality and roles in argument1 2016The Virtuous Troll: Argumentative Virtues in the Age of (Technologically Enhanced) Argumentative Pluralism

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.