SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Completeness of Reporting (CORE) index identifies important deficiencies in observational study conference abstracts
16 references·1 citing·43 second hop
The Completeness of Reporting (CORE) index identifies important deficiencies in observational study conference abstracts (2008)The Completeness of Reporting (CORE) inde…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Full publication of results i…Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research (2005)Quality of Reporting of Obser…Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (2004)Bad reporting does not mean b…Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)Methodological index for non‐…AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF ORTHOPAEDIC ABSTRACTS AND SUBSEQUENT FULL-TEXT PUBLICATIONS (2002)AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF ORT…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)meta-analysis bias in locatio…Clinical impact versus factor analysis for quality of life questionnaire construction (1997)Clinical impact versus factor…Should Unpublished Data Be Included in Meta-analyses? (1993)Should Unpublished Data Be In…Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies (1993)Should unpublished data be in…More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)More Informative Abstracts Re…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Health Measurement Scales: A …The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Systematic Prioritization of the STARE-HI Reporting Items (2011)Systematic Prioritization of …Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. (2012)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,756 cited
  • 1989Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use9,594 cited
  • 2003Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument7,590 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 1998meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies1,370 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2007Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts996 cited
  • 1990More Informative Abstracts Revisited524 cited
  • 1993Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies365 cited
  • 2005Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research363 cited
  • 1997Clinical impact versus factor analysis for quality of life questionnaire construction326 cited
  • 2004Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

313 cited
  • 2002AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF ORTHOPAEDIC ABSTRACTS AND SUBSEQUENT FULL-TEXT PUBLICATIONS263 cited
  • 1993Should Unpublished Data Be Included in Meta-analyses?259 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2011Systematic Prioritization of the STARE-HI Reporting Items14 cited