Obstacles to diversity in construction: the example of Heathrow Terminal 5

Linda Clarke · Maria Gribling

35 citations0/0 files storedConstruction Management and Economics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Gender Diversity and Inequality Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies Career Development and Diversity

Abstract

Why does the construction industry remain a predominantly white, male, able-bodied enclave, despite all the efforts made to make it inclusive? What are the real obstacles to women, those from ethnic minority groups, in particular black and Asian, and those with disabilities entering and remaining in different construction occupations? The recruitment, employment and working conditions on a major and prestigious project in London, Heathrow Terminal 5, where concerted attempts were made to include the local diverse labour force and to improve representation of different minority groups, are examined. Given the high level of building activity, client encouragements and serious skill shortages, the fact that the demand for construction labour was not met by the ready supply of local labour and trainees suggests that the obstacles to inclusion are not related to demand or evident supply factors. Inappropriate provision of training, as well as employment and working conditions, shape the exclusivity of the construction industry. The conclusion drawn is that adherence to traditional practices—old-style apprenticeships, craft-based skill structures, an itinerant workforce, and intensive deployment of labour—are the real basis of the construction industry's lack of diversity. The study is part of a project for the Greater London Authority (GLA) on diversity performance in the London construction industry, conducted jointly with the Working Lives Institute of London Metropolitan University (GLA, 2007). It is based on semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, including representatives of the client BAA, contractors, trainers from a Further Education College, ConstructionSkills, union organizers, convenors and officers, and workers. The aim is to provide an industry perspective of the issues related to diversity in construction.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

References

2004How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches 2005Disability, work, and welfare 2007Industrial Relations, Migration, and Neoliberal Politics: The Case of the European Construction Sector 2002Perceptions of gender roles and attitudes toward work among male and female operatives in the Scottish construction industry 2005Gender and ethnic minority exclusion from skilled occupations in construction: a Western European comparison 2004CREATING EQUALITY IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: AN AGENDA FOR CHANGE FOR WOMEN AND ETHNIC MINORITIES 2004Women in construction

Cited by

2009Competence and competency in the EQF and in European VET systems 2019Games for Teaching Mathematics in Nigeria: What Happens to Pupils’ Engagement and Traditional Classroom Dynamics?2013Queering men and masculinities in construction: towards a research agenda 2017‘Black Boxes’ and ‘fracture points’: the regulation of gender equality in the UK and French construction industries 2009Enabling and disabling: disability in the British and Dutch construction sectors

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.