SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to Select a Journal to Submit and Publish Your Biomedical Paper?
16 references·9 citing·43 second hop
How to Select a Journal to Submit and Publish Your Biomedical Paper? (2012)How to Select a Journal to Submit and Pub…Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing (2011)Open access, readership, cita…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level (2007)The h-index: Advantages, limi…eTBLAST: a web server to identify expert reviewers, appropriate journals and similar publications (2007)eTBLAST: a web server to iden…The Journal Impact Factor: Too Much of an Impact? (2006)The Journal Impact Factor: To…Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process…Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…On the Opportunities and Limitations of the H-index (2006)On the Opportunities and Limi…The "impact factor" revisited (2005)The "impact factor" revisitedDoes the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? (2005)Does the h-index for ranking …An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Measuring the Quality of Edit…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation (1997)Peer review for journals: Evi…Which Medical Journals Have the Greatest Impact? (1986)Which Medical Journals Have t…Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications (1986)Evaluation of some methods fo…Factors affecting authors' manuscript submission behaviour: A systematic review (2023)Factors affecting authors' ma…Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: How to Choose a Journal? (2020)Scientific Publishing in Biom…Are articles in library and information science (LIS) journals primarily contributed to by LIS authors? (2019)Are articles in library and i…The Second Mediterranean Seminar on Science Writing, Editing and Publishing (SWEP - 2018), Sarajevo, December 8th, 2018 (2018)The Second Mediterranean Semi…How do I peer-review a scientific article?—a personal perspective (2018)How do I peer-review a scient…An analysis of discontinued journals by Scopus (2018)An analysis of discontinued j…How do I write a scientific article?—A personal perspective (2017)How do I write a scientific a…Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting the right medical science journal (2016)Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting t…Choosing the scientific journal for publishing research work: perceptions of medical and dental researchers (2016)Choosing the scientific journ…Index aims for fair ranking of scientists (2005)The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)The state of h index research (2008)An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example (2011)Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)A Descriptive and Historical Review of Bibliometrics with Applications to Medical Sciences (2015)Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2016)Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Principles of forecasting : a handbook for researchers and practitioners (2001)Scientific Utopia (2012)Media representation of Muslims and Islam from 2000 to 2015: A meta-analysis (2016)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)A Hirsch-type index for journals (2006)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)The inconsistency of the h‐index (2011)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism (1970)Job Market Signaling (1973)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The impact of free access to the scientific literature: a review of recent research (2011)Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact (2012)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Scientific peer review (2011)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals868 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals794 cited
  • 2007The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level494 cited
  • 2005Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?398 cited
  • 2011Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing298 cited
  • 1997Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation262 cited
  • 2002Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review230 cited
  • 2005The "impact factor" revisited229 cited
  • 1986Which Medical Journals Have the Greatest Impact?189 cited
  • 2006On the Opportunities and Limitations of the H-index180 cited
  • 1986Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications158 cited
  • 2007eTBLAST: a web server to identify expert reviewers, appropriate journals and similar publications

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

99 cited
  • 2006The Journal Impact Factor: Too Much of an Impact?89 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018An analysis of discontinued journals by Scopus33 cited
    • 2016Choosing the scientific journal for publishing research work: perceptions of medical and dental researchers28 cited
    • 2020Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: How to Choose a Journal?17 cited
    • 2023Factors affecting authors' manuscript submission behaviour: A systematic review16 cited
    • 2017How do I write a scientific article?—A personal perspective16 cited
    • 2018The Second Mediterranean Seminar on Science Writing, Editing and Publishing (SWEP - 2018), Sarajevo, December 8th, 201816 cited
    • 2019Are articles in library and information science (LIS) journals primarily contributed to by LIS authors?16 cited
    • 2018How do I peer-review a scientific article?—a personal perspective14 cited
    • 2016Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting the right medical science journal13 cited