References

• 1994Differential Item Functioning.2,091 cited
• 1990Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression Procedures1,076 cited
• 2013Differential Item Performance and the Mantel–Haenszel Procedure721 cited
• 1993A Model-Based Standardization Approach that Separates True Bias/DIF from Group Ability Differences and Detects Test Bias/DTF as well as Item Bias/DIF660 cited
• 2001Evaluating Type I Error and Power Rates Using an Effect Size Measure With the Logistic Regression Procedure for DIF Detection520 cited
• 1981Using Simulation Results to Choose a Latent Trait Model304 cited
• 1993A Comparison of Logistic Regression and Mantel-Haenszel Procedures for Detecting Differential Item Functioning301 cited
• 1996Simulation Studies of the Effects of Small Sample Size and Studied Item Parameters on SIBTEST and Mantel‐Haenszel Type I Error Performance256 cited
• 1993Practical questions in the use of DIF statistics in test development.254 cited
• 1992On the Misuse of Manifest Variables in the Detection of Measurement Bias203 cited
• 1996Identification of Items that Show Nonuniform DIF161 cited
• 1990When Do Item Response Function and Mantel-Haenszel Definitions of Differential Item Functioning Coincide?158 cited
• 1989Analysis of Differential Item Functioning in the NAEP History Assessment158 cited
• 1996Item‐Bundle DIF Hypothesis Testing: Identifying Suspect Bundles and Assessing Their Differential Functioning