SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Bias in experimental nursing research: Strategies to improve the quality and explanatory power of nursing science
14 references·1 citing·37 second hop
Bias in experimental nursing research: Strategies to improve the quality and explanatory power of nursing science (2009)Bias in experimental nursing research: St…Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (2024)Handbook of Research Methods …Research Design and Issues of Validity (2014)Research Design and Issues of…Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (2014)Handbook of Research Methods …Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement (2008)Improving the reporting of pr…Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Empirical evidence of bias in…The Randomized Controlled Trial: gold standard, or merely standard? (2005)The Randomized Controlled Tri…How to spot bias and other potential problems in randomised controlled trials (2004)How to spot bias and other po…Randomized controlled trials of socially complex nursing interventions: creating bias and unreliability? (2003)Randomized controlled trials …Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The Need for Randomised Controlled Trials in Educational Research (2001)The Need for Randomised Contr…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Methodological Reporting of Randomized Trials in Five Leading Chinese Nursing Journals (2014)Methodological Reporting of R…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation (1991)Are you happy for me? How sharing positive events with others provides personal and interpersonal benefits. (2010)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)Vicarious intergroup contact effects (2011)Coworker incivility and incivility targets' work effort and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating role of supervisor social support. (2012)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Should We Trust Web-Based Studies? A Comparative Analysis of Six Preconceptions About Internet Questionnaires. (2004)The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. (2006)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and Standardizing Evaluation Reports of Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions (2011)From Power to Action. (2003)Seeing Black: Race, Crime, and Visual Processing. (2004)Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
  • 2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2,534 cited
  • 2024Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology2,121 cited
  • 2014Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology1,942 cited
  • 2008Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement1,811 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2014Research Design and Issues of Validity522 cited
  • 2005The Randomized Controlled Trial: gold standard, or merely standard?300 cited
  • 2001The Need for Randomised Controlled Trials in Educational Research146 cited
  • 2004How to spot bias and other potential problems in randomised controlled trials78 cited
  • 2003Randomized controlled trials of socially complex nursing interventions: creating bias and unreliability?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

66 cited

Cited by

  • 2014Methodological Reporting of Randomized Trials in Five Leading Chinese Nursing Journals9 cited