Biomarkers Unbound — The Supreme Court's Ruling on Diagnostic-Test Patents

Aaron Seth Kesselheim · Jason H. Karlawish

12 citations0/0 files storedNew England Journal of Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Intellectual Property and Patents Intellectual Property Law Medical and Health Sciences Research

Abstract

Interview with Dr. Aaron Kesselheim on a recent Supreme Court ruling on patents for diagnostic tests. (16:28)Download In Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, the Supreme Court has proscribed patents from covering correlations used in making biomarker-based diagnoses when those patents simply describe “steps that must be taken in order to apply” a natural law.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

References

2006Medical-Process Patents — Monopolizing the Delivery of Health Care

Cited by

2014The Evolving Role of Biomarker Patents in Personalized Medicine

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.