Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The “how” and “whys” of research: life scientists’ views of accountability

15 references·3 citing·34 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1990Science as Social Knowledge3,090 cited
2007The Honest Broker2,019 cited
1945Science: The Endless Frontier1,487 cited
1999The science studies reader1,241 cited
1992Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry1,133 cited
1999Science's new social contract with society881 cited
1996Frontiers of illusion: science, technology, and the politics of progress358 cited
2020Science, the Endless Frontier321 cited
2006Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research254 cited
2005The Public Value of Science (or how to ensure that science really matters)186 cited
1998Evaluation of the Research Norms of Scientists and Administrators Responsible for Academic Research Integrity57 cited
2005Geneticists' views on science policy formation and public outreach45 cited
2005Should we make a fuss? A case for social responsibility in science45 cited
2009Scientist Citizens42 cited
2004Responsible Biology38 cited

Cited by

2015An empirical exploration of scientists’ social responsibilities

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

14 cited

2014Policies to increase the social value of science and the scientist satisfaction. An exploratory survey among Harvard bioscientists.8 cited

2016Increasing the public health potential of basic research and the scientist satisfaction. An international survey of bioscientists6 cited