SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment
0 references·16 citing·56 second hopsampled
The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2013)The San Francisco Declaration on Research…Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities (2024)Open Science at the generativ…Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved (2023)Why research integrity matter…An analysis of reporting practices in the top 100 cited health and medicine-related bibliometric studies from 2019 to 2021 based on a proposed guidelines (2023)An analysis of reporting prac…Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities (2021)Towards wide-scale adoption o…Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science (2021)Rethinking success, integrity…How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals (2021)How faculty define quality, p…Stagnation and Scientific Incentives (2020)Stagnation and Scientific Inc…The pricing of open access journals: Diverse niches and sources of value in academic publishing (2019)The pricing of open access jo…How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia (2019)How to avoid borrowed plumes …CiteScore metrics: Creating journal metrics from the Scopus citation index (2019)CiteScore metrics: Creating j…Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts? (2018)Could scientists use Altmetri…A better measure of research from the global south (2018)A better measure of research …Critical remarks on the Italian research assessment exercise VQR 2011–2014 (2017)Critical remarks on the Itali…The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus (2016)The museum of errors/horrors …Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles (2015)Geometric journal impact fact…Changing knowledge ecologies and the transformation of the scholarly journal (2014)Changing knowledge ecologies …Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings (2009)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Are Mendeley reader counts useful impact indicators in all fields? (2017)ResearchGate versus Google Scholar: Which finds more early citations? (2017)Do females create higher impact research? Scopus citations and Mendeley readers for articles from five countries (2018)The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits (2002)San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2013)The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study (2013)The mismeasure of science: Citation analysis (2017)General discussion of data quality challenges in social media metrics: Extensive comparison of four major altmetric data aggregators (2018)Regional resilience: a stretched concept? (2018)Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. (1996)Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. (1999)Mining network-level properties of Twitter altmetrics data (2019)The Pros and Cons of the Use of Altmetrics in Research Assessment (2020)Early indicators of scientific impact: Predicting citations with altmetrics (2021)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)S&T indicators in the wild: Contextualization and participation for responsible metrics (2018)A synthesis of the frameworks available to guide evaluations of research impact at the interface of environmental science, policy and practice (2020)Culturally diverse expert teams have yet to bring comprehensive linguistic diversity to intergovernmental ecosystem assessments (2021)The Impact Factor Game (2006)The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)CiteScore: Advances, Evolution, Applications, and Limitations (2020)Interorganizational learning: a bibliometric review and research agenda (2020)Indicadores bibliométricos para evaluar la actividad científica (2021)Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (1921)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)The Matthew effect of a journal's ranking (2020)On the very idea of pursuitworthiness (2021)Reproducibility and replicability crisis: How management compares to psychology and economics – A systematic review of literature (2021)Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition (1974)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Who’s writing open access (OA) articles? Characteristics of OA authors at Ph.D.-granting institutions in the United States (2020)Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation (2022)The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing (2023)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact (2013)What Can We Do to Improve Peer Review in NLP? (2020)Gender homophily: In-group citation preferences and the gender disadvantage (2023)Exploring the effect of R&D support, green technology transfer, sustainable innovation (2024)Diffusion of innovations (2003)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Open science (2023)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Heterogeneity in effect size estimates (2024)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)The use of bibliometrics in nursing science: Topics, data sources and contributions to research and practice (2024)ChatGPT Research: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Web of Science from 2023 to June 2024 (2025)Guidance for the reporting of bibliometric analyses: A scoping review (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2018Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts?123 cited
  • 2016The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus119 cited
  • 2021Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities110 cited
  • 2019How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia101 cited
  • 2018A better measure of research from the global south88 cited
  • 2015Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles71 cited
  • 2023An analysis of reporting practices in the top 100 cited health and medicine-related bibliometric studies from 2019 to 2021 based on a proposed guidelines66 cited
  • 2019The pricing of open access journals: Diverse niches and sources of value in academic publishing64 cited
  • 2020Stagnation and Scientific Incentives64 cited
  • 2019CiteScore metrics: Creating journal metrics from the Scopus citation index63 cited
  • 2017Critical remarks on the Italian research assessment exercise VQR 2011–201455 cited
  • 2021How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals49 cited
  • 2021Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science47 cited
  • 2023

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved
47 cited
  • 2014Changing knowledge ecologies and the transformation of the scholarly journal46 cited
  • 2024Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities40 cited