The Epidemiology of Major Depressive Disorder

Abstract

CONTEXT: Uncertainties exist about prevalence and correlates of major depressive disorder (MDD). OBJECTIVE: To present nationally representative data on prevalence and correlates of MDD by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria, and on study patterns and correlates of treatment and treatment adequacy from the recently completed National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). DESIGN: Face-to-face household survey conducted from February 2001 to December 2002. SETTING: The 48 contiguous United States. PARTICIPANTS: Household residents ages 18 years or older (N = 9090) who responded to the NCS-R survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence and correlates of MDD using the World Health Organization's (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), 12-month severity with the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR), the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and the WHO disability assessment scale (WHO-DAS). Clinical reinterviews used the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. RESULTS: The prevalence of CIDI MDD for lifetime was 16.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.1-17.3) (32.6-35.1 million US adults) and for 12-month was 6.6% (95% CI, 5.9-7.3) (13.1-14.2 million US adults). Virtually all CIDI 12-month cases were independently classified as clinically significant using the QIDS-SR, with 10.4% mild, 38.6% moderate, 38.0% severe, and 12.9% very severe. Mean episode duration was 16 weeks (95% CI, 15.1-17.3). Role impairment as measured by SDS was substantial as indicated by 59.3% of 12-month cases with severe or very severe role impairment. Most lifetime (72.1%) and 12-month (78.5%) cases had comorbid CIDI/DSM-IV disorders, with MDD only rarely primary. Although 51.6% (95% CI, 46.1-57.2) of 12-month cases received health care treatment for MDD, treatment was adequate in only 41.9% (95% CI, 35.9-47.9) of these cases, resulting in 21.7% (95% CI, 18.1-25.2) of 12-month MDD being adequately treated. Sociodemographic correlates of treatment were far less numerous than those of prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: Major depressive disorder is a common disorder, widely distributed in the population, and usually associated with substantial symptom severity and role impairment. While the recent increase in treatment is encouraging, inadequate treatment is a serious concern. Emphasis on screening and expansion of treatment needs to be accompanied by a parallel emphasis on treatment quality improvement.

Cite this

Ronald C. Kessler, Patricia A. Berglund, Olga Demler, Robert Jin, Doreen Spilton Koretz, Kathleen Ries Merikangas, … Philip S. Wang (2003). The Epidemiology of Major Depressive Disorder. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.23.3095

@article{c2003the,
  title  = {The Epidemiology of Major Depressive Disorder},
  author = {Kessler, Ronald C. and Berglund, Patricia A. and Demler, Olga and Jin, Robert and Koretz, Doreen Spilton and Merikangas, Kathleen Ries and Rush, Augustus John and Walters, Ellen E. and Wang, Philip S.},
  year   = {2003},
  journal = {JAMA},
  doi    = {10.1001/jama.289.23.3095}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7,981 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by