SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Methods for obtaining unpublished data
13 references·16 citing·45 second hop
Methods for obtaining unpublished data (2011)Methods for obtaining unpublished dataChecking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews (2011)Checking reference lists to f…Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Chapter 10: Addressing report…The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)The impact of outcome reporti…Searching for Studies (2008)Searching for StudiesCochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Addressing Reporting Biases (2008)Addressing Reporting BiasesGrey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions (2007)Grey literature in meta-analy…Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Full publication of results i…Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources (2005)Effectiveness and efficiency …Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…Publication and Related Biases (2001)Publication and Related BiasesPublication and related biases. (2000)Publication and related biase…Retrospective and Prospective Identification of Unpublished Controlled Trials: Lessons From a Survey of Obstetricians and Pediatricians (1989)Retrospective and Prospective…Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review (2023)Reviewer training for improvi…Include or not to include conference abstracts in systematic reviews? Lessons learned from a large Cochrane network meta-analysis including 585 trials (2022)Include or not to include con…Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy (2020)Searching practices and inclu…Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase (2019)Search strategies to identify…Evaluating the effectiveness, efficiency, cost and value of contacting study authors in a systematic review: a case study and worked example (2019)Evaluating the effectiveness,…Contacting of authors modified crucial outcomes of systematic reviews but was poorly reported, not systematic, and produced conflicting results (2019)Contacting of authors modifie…Contacting authors by telephone increased response proportions compared with emailing: results of a randomized study (2019)Contacting authors by telepho…Systematic Review of the Literature: Best Practices (2018)Systematic Review of the Lite…Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 8: identifying quasi-experimental studies to inform systematic reviews (2017)Quasi-experimental study desi…Contacting of authors by systematic reviewers: protocol for a cross-sectional study and a survey (2017)Contacting of authors by syst…Disconnected by design: analytic approach in treatment networks having no common comparator (2016)Disconnected by design: analy…Why do we need Evidence-Based Methods in Cochrane? (2015)Why do we need Evidence-Based…Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Is Associated With Broad Impairments in Executive Function (2014)Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder…The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: Recent advancements, challenges and opportunities (2013)The application of knowledge …Searching for unpublished data for Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study (2013)Searching for unpublished dat…Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE (2013)Search strategies to identify…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. (2012)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Small study effects in meta-analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta-epidemiological study (2010)Motivation Interventions in Education (2015)Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation (2017)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods (2005)Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups (2006)Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education (2013)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Psychological interventions for parents of children and adolescents with chronic illness (2012)Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 (2014)How to do a systematic review (2017)Efficacy of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia – A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2015)Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: A review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2016)Racial/ethnic discrimination and well-being during adolescence: A meta-analytic review. (2018)Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2004)Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review (2010)A quantitative meta-analysis of neurocognitive functioning in posttraumatic stress disorder. (2014)An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies (2009)Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews (2011)Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2005Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources2,042 cited
  • 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
  • 2007Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts996 cited
  • 2011Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases978 cited
  • 2008Addressing Reporting Biases651 cited
  • 2008Searching for Studies599 cited
  • 2007Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions598 cited
  • 2001Publication and Related Biases465 cited
  • 2011Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews445 cited
  • 2000Publication and related biases.427 cited
  • 1989Retrospective and Prospective Identification of Unpublished Controlled Trials: Lessons From a Survey of Obstetricians and Pediatricians124 cited

Cited by

  • 2014Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Is Associated With Broad Impairments in Executive Function325 cited
  • 2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Systematic Review of the Literature: Best Practices
105 cited
  • 2022Include or not to include conference abstracts in systematic reviews? Lessons learned from a large Cochrane network meta-analysis including 585 trials62 cited
  • 2019Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase61 cited
  • 2013Searching for unpublished data for Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study43 cited
  • 2013The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: Recent advancements, challenges and opportunities43 cited
  • 2016Disconnected by design: analytic approach in treatment networks having no common comparator42 cited
  • 2017Contacting of authors by systematic reviewers: protocol for a cross-sectional study and a survey26 cited
  • 2017Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 8: identifying quasi-experimental studies to inform systematic reviews25 cited
  • 2020Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy23 cited
  • 2019Evaluating the effectiveness, efficiency, cost and value of contacting study authors in a systematic review: a case study and worked example20 cited
  • 2019Contacting authors by telephone increased response proportions compared with emailing: results of a randomized study20 cited
  • 2019Contacting of authors modified crucial outcomes of systematic reviews but was poorly reported, not systematic, and produced conflicting results18 cited
  • 2023Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review17 cited
  • 2013Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE12 cited
  • 2015Why do we need Evidence-Based Methods in Cochrane?12 cited