Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Tobacco industry success in preventing regulation of secondhand smoke in Latin America: the “Latin Project”

7 references·16 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1998US Environmental Protection Agency5,897 cited
1996The Cigarette Papers339 cited
2001Constructing “Sound Science” and “Good Epidemiology”: Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms243 cited
2000Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study191 cited
2001The Smoke You Don't See: Uncovering Tobacco Industry Scientific Strategies Aimed Against Environmental Tobacco Smoke Policies151 cited
2001Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents120 cited
1980Letter to John52 cited

Cited by

2005Public Health Chronicles229 cited
2008Tobacco Industry Efforts to Undermine Policy-Relevant Research106 cited
2008Tobacco industry issues management organizations: Creating a global corporate network to undermine public health105 cited
2005Tobacco industry successfully prevented tobacco control legislation in Argentina91 cited
2008Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report curbing the epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control88 cited
2007Tobacco Industry Efforts Undermining Evidence Linking Secondhand Smoke With Cardiovascular Disease80 cited
2005The tobacco industry's worldwide ETS consultants project: European and Asian components

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

71 cited

2004The Philippine tobacco industry: “the strongest tobacco lobby in Asia”68 cited

2012Tobacco industry argues domestic trademark laws and international treaties preclude cigarette health warning labels, despite consistent legal advice that the argument is invalid: Table 164 cited

2007“Accommodating” smoke-free policies: tobacco industry’s Courtesy of Choice programme in Latin America55 cited

2006German tobacco industry’s successful efforts to maintain scientific and political respectability to prevent regulation of secondhand smoke55 cited

2005Changing Conclusions on Secondhand Smoke in a Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Review Funded by the Tobacco Industry53 cited

2008Tobacco industry sociological programs to influence public beliefs about smoking51 cited

2008Tobacco industry strategies to obstruct the FCTC in Argentina48 cited

2005Environmental tobacco smoke research published in the journal Indoor and Built Environment and associations with the tobacco industry48 cited

2009Criteria for evaluating tobacco control research funding programs and their application to models that include financial support from the tobacco industry45 cited