Romans 1:18-32 amidst the gay-debate: Interpretative options

Jeremy Punt

9 citations0/0 files storedHTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Biblical Studies and Interpretation Qur’anic Interpretation Studies Religious and Theological Studies

Abstract

The prominence of Romans 1:18-32 in the gay-debate is the subject of various and wide-ranging opinions as far as the most adequate interpretation of this passage. This contribution puts the debate about the text into perspective by surveying some recent alternative opinions on its meaning. It is established that two particular matters are most important in Romans 1:18-32 and the past and current debate on its interpretation: the argument according to “nature” and the nature of the infringement or error (Rm 1:27).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.

References

1995A rereading of Romans: justice, Jews, and gentiles 1988Dirt, greed, and sex : sexual ethics in the New Testament and their implications for today 1996Liberating Paul: The Justice of God and the Politics of the Apostle 1996A Rereading of Romans: Justice, Jews, and Gentiles 1984Issues Facing Christians Today 2000Paul and the Stoics 1992Paul, in Other Words: A Cultural Reading of His Letters 1995Heterosexism and the Interpretation of Romans 1:18-32

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.