The relationship between the qualitative and quantitative research traditions

Charles S. Reichardt · Sharon F. Rallis

49 citations0/0 files storedNew Directions for Program Evaluation

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Evaluation and Performance Assessment Educational Research and Methods Qualitative Research Methods and Applications

Abstract

Abstract Differences between the qualitative and quantitative research traditions can be used either to diminish or to enrich the practice of program evaluation.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 49 citations exist upstream.

References

1986But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation 1986Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research 1991How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life 1929Coming of Age in Samoa. A Psychological Study of Primitive Youth for Western Civilization.1982The Panda's Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History 1992Roots: Back to Our First Generations

Cited by

2004Le choix d’une approche méthodologique mixte de recherche en éducation 2008Advancement Via Individual Determination: Method Selection in Conclusions About Program Effectiveness 1997Introduction: Personality Psychology and the Case Study 2000After the “Social Meaning Turn”: Implications for Research Design and Methods of Proof in Contemporary Criminal Law Policy Analysis

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.